Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 6;2(2):e19.
doi: 10.2196/formative.9954.

A Stress Management App Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Design, Development, and Usability Testing

Affiliations

A Stress Management App Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Design, Development, and Usability Testing

Elin Børøsund et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Distress is prevalent in cancer survivors. Stress management interventions can reduce distress and improve quality of life for cancer patients, but many people with cancer are unfortunately not offered or able to attend such in-person stress management interventions.

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop an evidence-based stress management intervention for patients living with cancer that can be delivered electronically with wide reach and dissemination. This paper describes the design and development process of a technology-based stress management intervention for cancer survivors, including the exploration phase, intervention content development, iterative software development (including design, development, and formative evaluation of low- and high-level prototypes), and security and privacy considerations.

Methods: Design and development processes were iterative and performed in close collaboration with key stakeholders (N=48). In the exploration phase, identifying needs and requirements for the intervention, 28 participants gave input, including male and female cancer survivors (n=11) representing a wide age range (31-81 years) and cancer diagnoses, healthcare providers (n=8) including psychosocial oncology experts, and eHealth experts (n=9) including information technology design and developers. To ensure user involvement in each phase various user-centered design and service design methods were included, such as interviews, usability testing, and think aloud processes. Overall, participants were involved usability testing in the software development and formative evaluation phase, including cancer survivors (n=6), healthy volunteers (n=7), health care providers (n=2), and eHealth experts (n=5). Intervention content was developed by stress management experts based on well-known cognitive behavioral stress management strategies and adjusted to electronic format through multiple iterations with stakeholders. Privacy and security issues were considered throughout.

Results: The design and development process identified a variety of stakeholder requirements. Cancer survivors preferred stress management through a mobile app rather than through a personal computer (PC) and identified usefulness, easy access, user friendliness, use of easily understandable language, and many brief sections rather than longer ones as important components of the intervention. These requirements were also supported by recommendations from health care providers and eHealth experts. The final intervention was named StressProffen and the hospital Privacy and Security Protection Committee was part of the final intervention approval to also ensure anchoring in the hospital organization.

Conclusions: Interventions, even evidence-based, have little impact if not actively used. This study illustrates how user-centered design and service design can be applied to identify and incorporate essential stakeholder aspects in the entire design and development process. In combination with evidence-based concepts, this process facilitated development of a stress management intervention truly designed for the end users, in this case, cancer survivors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02939612; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02939612 (Archived at WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/71l9HcfcB).

Keywords: cancer; development; eHealth; mHealth; mindfulness; mobile apps; mobile phones; stress management; usability; user-centered design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development timeline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention development process and participants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustrated examples of personas. PC: personal computer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The StressProffen overview of modules and their content. QoL: quality of life.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Paper Prototypes from development.
Figure 6
Figure 6
StressProffen app screenshots.

References

    1. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001 Feb;10(1):19–28.10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::AID-PON501>3.0.CO;2-6 - PubMed
    1. Stanton AL. Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 10;24(32):5132–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8775.24/32/5132 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perczek RE, Burke MA, Carver CS, Krongrad A, Terris MK. Facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: who is at risk for increased distress? Cancer. 2002 Jun 01;94(11):2923–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10564. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pub... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark MM, Rummans TA, Atherton PJ, Cheville AL, Johnson ME, Frost MH, Miller JJ, Sloan JA, Graszer KM, Haas JG, Hanson JM, Garces YI, Piderman KM, Lapid MI, Netzel PJ, Richardson JW, Brown PD. Randomized controlled trial of maintaining quality of life during radiotherapy for advanced cancer. Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):880–7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27776. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27776. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland JC, Breitbart WS, Jacobsen PB, Lederberg MS, Loscalzo MJ, McCorkle RS. Psycho-Oncology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Associated data