Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 10:9:2748.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02748. eCollection 2018.

The Interaction Between Phonological and Semantic Processing in Reading Chinese Characters

Affiliations

The Interaction Between Phonological and Semantic Processing in Reading Chinese Characters

Min Dang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The contemporary models of visual word recognition reached a consensus on a cooperative division of labor between phonological and semantic processing. We examine how reading is influenced by the interaction of two processing in Chinese character reading since the ideographic property of the Chinese writing system is perfectly suitable to address this issue. The current study investigated whether Chinese character reading requires the interaction between orthography-to-phonology consistency and semantic processing of the whole character (imageability, Experiment 1) or the semantic radical (transparency, Experiment 2). Experiment 1 showed a significant effect of the consistency and a marginal effect of the imageability, but no interaction between the two. Experiment 2 found a significant effect of the semantic transparency and its interaction with phonological consistency, where the transparent effect was significant for inconsistent characters but not for consistent ones. The current finding provided direct evidence of the interplay between phonological and semantic processing and shed light on the language-general reading model.

Keywords: Chinese character; interaction; phonological; semantic; word reading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The result of Experiment 1. The RTs (Left) showed main effects of phonological consistency and semantic imageability but no interaction between them. The naming accuracy (Right) showed two main effects and their interaction.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The result of Experiment 2. Both the naming RTs (Left) and accuracy (Right) showed significant effects of phonological consistency, semantic transparency, and their interaction.

References

    1. Andrews S. (1982). Phonological recoding is the regularity effect consistent? Mem. Cogn. 10 565–575. 10.3758/BF03202439 - DOI
    1. Baayen R. H., Davidson D. J., Bates D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 - DOI
    1. Balota D. A., Cortese M. J., Sergent-Marshall S. D., Spieler D. H., Yap M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. J. Exp. Psychol. 133 283–316. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barr D. J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bi Y., Han Z., Weekes B., Shu H. (2007). The interaction between semantic and the nonsemantic systems in reading: evidence from Chinese. Neuropsychologia 45 2660–2673. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.007 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources