Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 9:9:3315.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03315. eCollection 2018.

The Critical Role of Genome Maintenance Proteins in Immune Evasion During Gammaherpesvirus Latency

Affiliations
Review

The Critical Role of Genome Maintenance Proteins in Immune Evasion During Gammaherpesvirus Latency

Océane Sorel et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Gammaherpesviruses are important pathogens that establish latent infection in their natural host for lifelong persistence. During latency, the viral genome persists in the nucleus of infected cells as a circular episomal element while the viral gene expression program is restricted to non-coding RNAs and a few latency proteins. Among these, the genome maintenance protein (GMP) is part of the small subset of genes expressed in latently infected cells. Despite sharing little peptidic sequence similarity, gammaherpesvirus GMPs have conserved functions playing essential roles in latent infection. Among these functions, GMPs have acquired an intriguing capacity to evade the cytotoxic T cell response through self-limitation of MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation, further ensuring virus persistence in the infected host. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the main functions of gammaherpesvirus GMPs during latency with an emphasis on their immune evasion properties.

Keywords: antigen presentation; genome maintenance protein; herpesvirus; immune evasion; viral latency; viral proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic representation of representative gammaherpesvirus GMPs. N- and C- terminal domains are separated by a central amino acid repeat domain (CR), highlighted in orange. Repeat residues are indicated. The RG-rich regions of EBNA-1 are depicted in blue. Genus Lymphocryptovirus: EBNA-1 (EBV, strain B95.8), rhEBNA1 (rhLCV, strain LCL8664) and baEBNA-1 (baLCV, strain S594). Genus Rhadinovirus: AtHV3 ORF73 (strain 73), LANA-1 (KSHV, strain JK-18), sLANA (SaHV-2, strain C488), rhLANA (M78114). Genus Percavirus: EHV-2 ORF73 (strain 86/87), EHV-5 (strain 2-141/67). Genus Macavirus: oLANA (OvHV-2, strain BJ1035), and aLANA (AlHV-1, strain C500).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cis-acting immune evasion of MHC Class I antigen presentation of gammaherpesvirus GMPs. The MHC class I antigen presentation pathway is depicted with described GMP-mediated cis-acting immune evasion mechanisms. Cytoplasmic endogenously expressed viral proteins are degraded by the proteasome into antigenic peptides that are then translocated from the cytosol to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through the transporter for antigen processing (TAP). Then, antigenic peptides are loaded on MHC class I molecules to form MHC-I-peptides complexes that are subsequently exported to the cell surface through the Golgi apparatus for recognition by CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. GMPs have been demonstrated to inhibit this process through various mechanisms: (1) sLANA and aLANA were shown to decrease their own steady-state RNA levels; (2) EBNA-1 can inhibit pre-mRNA processing of the primary EBNA-1 transcript; (3) structural constraints, such as G-quadruplexes (G4), contained in aLANA and EBNA-1 mRNA rather than protein sequences can regulate self-translation; (4) EBNA-1, aLANA, LANA-1, sLANA, and mLANA are able to induce retardation of self-translation; (5) EBNA-1, mLANA, and LANA-1 were shown to be protected from proteasomal degradation; (6) LANA-1 was reported to hold an inhibitory effect prior to translocation of its own cytoplasmic peptides into the ER.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altmann M., Pich D., Ruiss R., Wang J., Sugden B., Hammerschmidt W. (2006). Transcriptional activation by EBV nuclear antigen 1 is essential for the expression of EBV’s transforming genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 14188–14193. 10.1073/pnas.0605985103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson J. (2000). An overview of epstein-barr virus: from discovery to future directions for treatment and prevention. Herpes 7 76–82. - PubMed
    1. Anton L. C., Yewdell J. W. (2014). Translating DRiPs: MHC class I immunosurveillance of pathogens and tumors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 95 551–562. 10.1189/jlb.1113599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apcher S., Daskalogianni C., Manoury B., Fahraeus R. (2010). Epstein Barr virus-encoded EBNA1 interference with MHC class I antigen presentation reveals a close correlation between mRNA translation initiation and antigen presentation. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001151. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apcher S., Komarova A., Daskalogianni C., Yin Y., Malbert-Colas L., Fåhraeus R. (2009). mRNA translation regulation by the Gly-Ala repeat of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1. J. Virol. 83 1289–1298. 10.1128/jvi.01369-08 - DOI - PMC - PubMed