Potential surrogate plants for use in semi-field pesticide risk assessment with Megachile rotundata
- PMID: 30687587
- PMCID: PMC6340348
- DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6278
Potential surrogate plants for use in semi-field pesticide risk assessment with Megachile rotundata
Abstract
Background: Current regulatory pesticide risk assessments for bees are based primarily on the honey bee (Apis mellifera) and may not always be protective of solitary bees. To incorporate solitary bees into the risk assessment process, standardized methods to assess the hazard of pesticides under semi-field (Tier II) conditions will be needed. We conducted a series of experiments over 2 years to assess potential surrogate plants and adult release rates for use in semi-field experiments with the alfalfa leafcutting bee (ALB, Megachile rotundata).
Methods: We compared ALB foraging activity and reproduction on 12 m2 plots of flowering alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) at low (10♀/20♂) and high (20♀/40♂) adult release rates. The following year, we assessed the same endpoints on plots of purple tansy (Phacelia tanacetifolia) at a release rate of 10♀/15♂.
Results: Although ALB foraging activity was high on buckwheat plots, fewer adults were produced compared to alfalfa plots. On alfalfa, there were no differences in foraging activity, nesting, or reproduction between the low and high release rates. ALB readily foraged from purple tansy flowers, but females avoided purple tansy leaves for leaf cell construction.
Discussion: Our study suggests that buckwheat alone cannot support ALB during semi-field studies on small plots. For alfalfa, we recommend a maximum release rate of 10♀/20♂ in 12 m2 plots. Further study of higher ALB release rates on purple tansy is warranted. A mixed planting of purple tansy and a plant suitable for leaf piece collection (e.g., buckwheat) may provide favorable conditions for ALB activity and reproduction during semi-field testing.
Keywords: Non-apis; Risk assessment; Semi-field; Solitary bee.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Comparison of buckwheat, red clover, and purple tansy as potential surrogate plants for use in semi-field pesticide risk assessments with Bombus impatiens.PeerJ. 2016 Jul 14;4:e2228. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2228. eCollection 2016. PeerJ. 2016. PMID: 27478712 Free PMC article.
-
Contact toxicity of three insecticides for use in tier I pesticide risk assessments with Megachile rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).PeerJ. 2021 Feb 23;9:e10744. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10744. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 33665008 Free PMC article.
-
Seasonality and alternative floral resources affect reproductive success of the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata.PeerJ. 2024 Aug 16;12:e17902. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17902. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 39161964 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of microorganisms and entomopathogenic nematodes used for plant protection on solitary and social bee pollinators: Host range, specificity, pathogenicity, toxicity, and effects of experimental parameters.Environ Pollut. 2022 Jun 1;302:119051. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119051. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Environ Pollut. 2022. PMID: 35219794 Review.
-
The alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata: the world's most intensively managed solitary bee.Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:221-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144836. Annu Rev Entomol. 2011. PMID: 20809804 Review.
Cited by
-
Pollinators and plant nurseries: how irrigation and pesticide treatment of native ornamental plants impact solitary bees.Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 28;288(1955):20211287. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1287. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34315264 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alekseyeva ES, Bureyko AL. Bee visitation, nectar productivity and pollen efficiency of common buckwheat. Fagopyrum. 2000;17:77–80.
-
- Alix A, Steeger T, Brittain C, Fischer D, Johnson R, Moriarty T, Johansen E, Streissel F, Fischer R, Miles M, Lee-Steere C, Vaughan M, Vaissiere B, Maynard G, Kasina M, Nocelli RCF, Scott-Dupree C, Coulson M, Dinter A, Fry M. Pesticide risk assessment for pollinators. Wiley-Blackwell; Ames: 2014. Overview of a proposed ecological risk assessment process for honey bees (Apis mellifera) and non-Apis bees; pp. 121–148.
-
- Brittain C, Potts SG. The potential impacts of insecticides on the life-history traits of bees and the consequences for pollination. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2011;12:321–331. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.12.004. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous