Preoperative imaging for breast conservation surgery-do we need more than conventional imaging for local disease assessment?
- PMID: 30687628
- PMCID: PMC6323257
- DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.08.05
Preoperative imaging for breast conservation surgery-do we need more than conventional imaging for local disease assessment?
Abstract
Breast conservation surgery (BCS) is offered for early breast cancer. Conventional imaging with mammography and ultrasound would have been performed prior to surgery. This article considers other imaging modalities available [such as 3D tomosynthesis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, positron emission mammography (PEM), breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)] and discusses the evidence for these in terms of diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes.
Keywords: Preoperative imaging; breast conservation surgery (BCS).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):505-13. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000197. Invest Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26115367
-
Current breast imaging modalities, advances, and impact on breast care.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;40(3):429-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 24021251 Review.
-
Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 11;16:450. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2537-1. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27401536 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan;198(1):219-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6342. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012. PMID: 22194501 Clinical Trial.
-
Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):246-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100570. Epub 2010 Aug 24. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20736332 Review.
Cited by
-
Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6053-6058. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13884-8. Epub 2023 Jul 28. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37505353
-
Future perspectives for breast conservation treatment: science & art.Gland Surg. 2018 Dec;7(6):501-505. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.12.03. Gland Surg. 2018. PMID: 30687623 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of breast cancer patients who underwent partial mastectomy (PM) with mini latissimus dorsi flap (MLDF) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant (M + I) regarding quality of life (QOL), cosmetic outcome and survival rates.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 May 5;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01858-z. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32370753 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic value of MRI for architectural distortion categorized as BI-RADS category 3-4 by mammography.Gland Surg. 2020 Aug;9(4):1008-1018. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-505. Gland Surg. 2020. PMID: 32953609 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Teboul M. Advantages of Ductal Echography (DE) over conventional breast investigation in the diagnosis of breast malignancies. Med Ultrason 2010;12:32-42. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials