Validation of a Norwegian version of SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) in combination with the World Health Organizations' Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC)
- PMID: 30687799
- PMCID: PMC6327875
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000488
Validation of a Norwegian version of SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) in combination with the World Health Organizations' Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC)
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical safety checklists may contribute to reduction of complications and mortality. The WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) could prevent incidents in operating theatres, but errors also occur before and after surgery. The SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) is designed to intercept errors with use of checklists throughout the surgical pathway.
Objective: We aimed to validate a Norwegian version of the SURPASS' preoperative and postoperative checklists for use in combination with the already established Sign In, Time Out and Sign Out parts of the WHO SSC.
Methods and materials: The validation of the SURPASS checklists content followed WHOs recommended guidelines. The process consisted of six steps: forward translation; testing the content; focus groups; expert panels; back translation; and approval of the final version. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify codes and categories for adaption of the SURPASS checklist items throughout Norwegian surgical care. Content validity index (CVI) was used by expert panels to score the relevance of each checklist item. The study was carried out in a neurosurgical ward in a large tertiary teaching hospital in Norway.
Results: Testing the preoperative and postoperative SURPASS checklists was performed in 29 neurosurgical procedures. This involved all professional groups in the entire surgical patient care pathway. Eight clinical focus groups revealed two main categories: 'Adapt the wording to fit clinical practice' and 'The checklist items challenge existing workflow'. Interprofessional scoring of the content validity of the checklists reached >80% for all the SURPASS checklists.
Conclusions: The first version of the SURPASS checklists combined with the WHO SSC was validated for use in Norwegian surgical care with face validity confirmed and CVI >0.80%.
Trial registration number: NCT01872195.
Keywords: checklists; patient safety; quality improvement; surgery; transitions in care.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):562-570. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32401293 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Measuring variation in use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in the operating room: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jan;220(1):1-11.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 12. J Am Coll Surg. 2015. PMID: 25456785
-
The World Health Organisation's Surgical Safety Checklist in Belgian Operating Theatres: a Content-Driven Evaluation.Acta Chir Belg. 2015 Mar-Apr;115(2):147-54. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2015.11681085. Acta Chir Belg. 2015. PMID: 26021949
-
Impact of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist on Patient Safety.Anesthesiology. 2019 Aug;131(2):420-425. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002674. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 31090552 Review.
-
Impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Relative to Its Design and Intended Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis.J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Dec;233(6):794-809.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.692. Epub 2021 Sep 27. J Am Coll Surg. 2021. PMID: 34592406
Cited by
-
Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):562-570. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32401293 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The combined application of Mini-CEX and Check-list Scales in enhancing clinical competence among emergency and critical care residents: a comparative study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 11;12:1492206. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1492206. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40718409 Free PMC article.
-
Bridging the gap: assessing public understanding of medical terms in Saudi arabia's multilingual healthcare context.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07600-1. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40597081 Free PMC article.
-
A Qualitative Investigation of Factors Affecting Saudi Patients' Communication Experience with Non-Saudi Physicians in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;11(1):118. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010118. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36611579 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, et al. . To err is human: building a safer healthcare system. Institute of Medicine, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical