Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 1;173(3):244-250.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056.

Association Between Screen Time and Children's Performance on a Developmental Screening Test

Sheri Madigan  1   2 , Dillon Browne  3 , Nicole Racine  1   2 , Camille Mori  1   2 , Suzanne Tough  2
Affiliations

Association Between Screen Time and Children's Performance on a Developmental Screening Test

Sheri Madigan et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Erratum in

  • Errors in Abstract, Results, and Figure.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):501-502. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0515. JAMA Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30907942 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Excessive screen time is associated with delays in development; however, it is unclear if greater screen time predicts lower performance scores on developmental screening tests or if children with poor developmental performance receive added screen time as a way to modulate challenging behavior.

Objective: To assess the directional association between screen time and child development in a population of mothers and children.

Design, setting, and participants: This longitudinal cohort study used a 3-wave, cross-lagged panel model in 2441 mothers and children in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, drawn from the All Our Families study. Data were available when children were aged 24, 36, and 60 months. Data were collected between October 20, 2011, and October 6, 2016. Statistical analyses were conducted from July 31 to November 15, 2018.

Exposures: Media.

Main outcomes and measures: At age 24, 36, and 60 months, children's screen-time behavior (total hours per week) and developmental outcomes (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition) were assessed via maternal report.

Results: Of the 2441 children included in the analysis, 1227 (50.2%) were boys. A random-intercepts, cross-lagged panel model revealed that higher levels of screen time at 24 and 36 months were significantly associated with poorer performance on developmental screening tests at 36 months (β, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01) and 60 months (β, -0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02), respectively. These within-person (time-varying) associations statistically controlled for between-person (stable) differences.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this study support the directional association between screen time and child development. Recommendations include encouraging family media plans, as well as managing screen time, to offset the potential consequences of excess use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Tough reported grants from the Alberta Childrens Hospital Foundation, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, the MaxBell Foundation, CanFASD, and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Random-Intercepts, Cross-Lagged Panel Model Illustrating Within-Person Association Between Developmental Outcomes (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition [ASQ-3]) and Screen Time (Hours per Week) From Ages 24 to 60 Months, Controlling for Between-Person Differences
Standardized estimates (95% CIs) are presented. Solid lines represent estimates where 95% CIs do not include zero. The central, blue-tinted part of the model connected by black solid and dashed lines is the within-person (dynamic) part, and the outer, tan-tinted part of the model connected by gray lines is the between-person (stable) component. aPathways constrained to 1.00 to isolate between-person factor (n = 2441).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Janus M, Offord DR. Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): a measure of children’s school readiness. Can J Behav Sci. 2007;39(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/cjbs2007001 - DOI
    1. Browne DT, Wade M, Prime H, Jenkins JM. School readiness amongst urban Canadian families: risk profiles and family mediation. J Educ Psychol. 2018;110(1):133-146. doi: 10.1037/edu0000202 - DOI
    1. Stanovich KE. Matthew effects in reading—some consequences of individual-differences in the acquisition of literacy. Read Res Q. 1986;21(4):360-407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 - DOI
    1. Browne DT, Rokeach A, Wiener J, Hoch JS, Meunier JC, Thurston S. Examining the family-level and economic impact of complex child disabilities as a function of child hyperactivity and service integration. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013;25(2):181-201. doi: 10.1007/s10882-012-9295-z - DOI
    1. Heckman JJ. Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science. 2006;312(5782):1900-1902. doi: 10.1126/science.1128898 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types