Prognostic Characterization of Higher-Grade Meningiomas: A Histopathological Score to Predict Progression and Outcome
- PMID: 30689922
- PMCID: PMC6380327
- DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nly127
Prognostic Characterization of Higher-Grade Meningiomas: A Histopathological Score to Predict Progression and Outcome
Abstract
Higher-grade meningiomas (WHO grade II and III) represent a diagnostic and prognostic challenge. We assessed the pathological and molecular characteristics of 94 higher-grade meningiomas (85 grade II, 9 grade III) to identify novel prognostic parameters. Higher mitotic count (p = 0.018), diffuse (≥50%) prominent nucleoli (p < 0.001), and sheeting (p < 0.001) were associated with recurrence. Lower SSTR2a-positive cells median rate (p = 0.048) and TERT promoter mutations (p = 0.014) were associated with recurrence and patient death, respectively; further analyses did not identify other outcome associations. Presence of Ki67 hot spots was associated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS), independently of WHO grade at multivariate analysis (HR = 3.35, p = 0.008). Necrosis was related to a poorer overall survival (OS) at univariate (focal: HR = 4.55, p = 0.041 and diffuse: HR = 7.38, p = 0.020) and Kaplan-Meier analyses. A prognostic score was designed based on previous results: Presence of diffuse (≥50%) prominent nucleoli (0/1 point), diffuse (≥50%) sheeting (0/1 point), focal (<50%) or diffuse (≥50%) necrosis (0/1/2 points), and Ki67 hot spots (0/1 point). A total score ≥4 predicted poorer PFS and OS by Kaplan-Meier (PFS: 1.7 vs 6.4 years, p < 0.001 and OS: 5.2 vs 10.8 years, p = 0.001) and multivariate (PFS: HR = 5.98, p < 0.001 and OS: HR = 2.99, p = 0.048) analyses. These results were confirmed in an independent series of 58 grade II meningiomas (PFS: HR = 7.22, p = 0.002 and OS: HR = 9.69, p = 0.003). These associations and the integrated score could complement WHO grading.
Keywords: Ki67; Meningioma; Prognosis; Prognostic factors; SSTR2a; Score; TERT.
© 2019 American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
TERT promoter mutation is associated with worse prognosis in WHO grade II and III meningiomas.J Neurooncol. 2018 Sep;139(3):671-678. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2912-7. Epub 2018 May 28. J Neurooncol. 2018. PMID: 29808339
-
World Health Organization Grade II Meningiomas: The Role of Adjuvant/Salvage Gamma Knife Surgery After Initial Surgery and Prognostic Factor Assessment.World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e352-e362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.178. Epub 2017 Oct 5. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28987849
-
WHO grade II and III meningiomas: a study of prognostic factors.J Neurooncol. 2009 Dec;95(3):367-375. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9934-0. Epub 2009 Jun 27. J Neurooncol. 2009. PMID: 19562258
-
Differential Tumor Progression Patterns in Skull Base Versus Non-Skull Base Meningiomas: A Critical Analysis from a Long-Term Follow-Up Study and Review of Literature.World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e74-e83. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.035. Epub 2017 Dec 16. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29258946 Review.
-
Poor prognosis associated with TERT gene alterations in meningioma is independent of the WHO classification: an individual patient data meta-analysis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;91(4):378-387. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322257. Epub 2020 Feb 10. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32041819 Review.
Cited by
-
A prognostic model for tumor recurrence and progression after meningioma surgery: preselection for further molecular work-up.Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;13:1279933. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1279933. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38023177 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Molecular and Genetic Analysis on the Treatment of Patients with Atypical Meningiomas.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;14(16):1782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161782. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39202270 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic significance of brain invasion in meningiomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.Brain Tumor Pathol. 2021 Apr;38(2):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2021. PMID: 33403457
-
A deep learning radiomics model may help to improve the prediction performance of preoperative grading in meningioma.Neuroradiology. 2022 Jul;64(7):1373-1382. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-02894-0. Epub 2022 Jan 17. Neuroradiology. 2022. PMID: 35037985
-
Atypical meningioma: Histopathological, genetic, and epigenetic features to predict recurrence risk.Histol Histopathol. 2024 Mar;39(3):293-302. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-670. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Histol Histopathol. 2024. PMID: 37921468 Review.
References
-
- Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al. . WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Revised 4th edition Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016
-
- Perry A, Scheithauer BW, Stafford SL et al. . “Malignancy” in meningiomas: A clinicopathologic study of 116 patients, with grading implications. Cancer 1999;85:2046–56 - PubMed
-
- Sughrue ME, Sanai N, Shangari G et al. . Outcome and survival following primary and repeat surgery for World Health Organization Grade III meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2010;113:202–9 - PubMed