Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May:201:9-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 26.

A Deep Learning Algorithm to Quantify Neuroretinal Rim Loss From Optic Disc Photographs

Affiliations

A Deep Learning Algorithm to Quantify Neuroretinal Rim Loss From Optic Disc Photographs

Atalie C Thompson et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To train a deep learning (DL) algorithm that quantifies glaucomatous neuroretinal damage on fundus photographs using the minimum rim width relative to Bruch membrane opening (BMO-MRW) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT).

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: A total of 9282 pairs of optic disc photographs and SDOCT optic nerve head scans from 927 eyes of 490 subjects were randomly divided into the validation plus training (80%) and test sets (20%). A DL convolutional neural network was trained to predict the SDOCT BMO-MRW global and sector values when evaluating optic disc photographs. The predictions of the DL network were compared to the actual SDOCT measurements. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of the network to discriminate glaucomatous visual field loss from normal eyes.

Results: The DL predictions of global BMO-MRW from all optic disc photographs in the test set (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 228.8 ± 63.1 μm) were highly correlated with the observed values from SDOCT (mean ± SD: 226.0 ± 73.8 μm) (Pearson's r = 0.88; R2 = 77%; P < .001), with mean absolute error of the predictions of 27.8 μm. The AUCs for discriminating glaucomatous from healthy eyes with the DL predictions and actual SDOCT global BMO-MRW measurements were 0.945 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.874-0.980) and 0.933 (95% CI: 0.856-0.975), respectively (P = .587).

Conclusions: A DL network can be trained to quantify the amount of neuroretinal damage on optic disc photographs using SDOCT BMO-MRW as a reference. This algorithm showed high accuracy for glaucoma detection, and may potentially eliminate the need for human gradings of disc photographs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scatterplot illustrating the relationship between predictions obtained by the deep learning algorithm evaluating optic disc photographs and actual global minimum rim width relative to Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO-MRW) thickness measurements from spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). Data is from the independent test set.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Activation heatmaps showing the areas of the optic disc photograph that were most important for the deep learning algorithm predictions in an example of a healthy (Top row) and glaucomatous (Bottom row) eye.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Random examples of optic disc photos from the test sample along with the corresponding global minimum rim width (MRW) relative to Bruch’s membrane opening deep learning (DL) predictions and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) measurements. (Top) Random examples where predictions closely agreed to observations (within 20μm). (Bottom) Random examples where the predictions disagreed with the observations (greater than 50μm difference).

References

    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90(3):262–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Budenz DL, Barton K, Whiteside-de Vos J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in an urban West African population: the Tema Eye Survey. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131(5):651–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hennis A, Wu SY, Nemesure B, et al. Awareness of incident open-angle glaucoma in a population study: the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology 2007;114(10):1816–21. - PubMed
    1. Sathyamangalam RV, Paul PG, George R, et al. Determinants of glaucoma awareness and knowledge in urban Chennai. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57(5):355–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA 2014;311(18):1901–11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms