Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;61(1):30-37.
doi: 10.1111/sjop.12516. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

Bystanders' affect toward bully and victim as predictors of helping and non-helping behaviour

Affiliations

Bystanders' affect toward bully and victim as predictors of helping and non-helping behaviour

Jessica Trach et al. Scand J Psychol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The current study examined how children's relationship with the bully and victim impacted their reactions as bystanders. An ethnically diverse sample of 2,513 Canadian students in grades 4-7 responded to questions about their experiences of bullying, including the frequency with which they witnessed bullying at school. Approximately 89% of the sample reported witnessing bullying at school during the current school year. Subsequently, participants were asked to recall a specific bullying incident that they witnessed and describe: (1) their relationship with the bully and victim; (2) how they felt while witnessing; and (3) how they responded as a bystander. Compared to situations where they didn't know the victim, bystanders were more likely to intervene directly (e.g., try to stop the bully, comfort the victim) if they liked the victim, and less likely to tell an adult if they disliked the victim. Aggressive intervention was more common if the witness didn't like the bully, but also if they didn't like the victim compared to if they didn't know them. Regarding emotions, anger emerged as an especially powerful predictor of bystander defending, with youth being over five times more likely to try to stop the bullying or comfort the victim if they felt angry. Implications of these findings for the development of ecologically valid, anti-bullying interventions are discussed.

Keywords: Bullying; bystander; group processes; peer relationships; social-emotional.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahmed, E. (2008). Stop it, that's enough: Bystander intervention and its relationship to school connectedness and shame management. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 3, 203-213.
    1. Ahmed, E. & Braithwaite, V. (2004). “What, me ashamed?” Shame management and school bullying. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 269-294.
    1. Bellmore, A., Ma, T., You, J. & Hughes, M. (2012). A two-method investigation of early adolescents’ responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1265-1276.
    1. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2016) What is SEL? Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/what-is-sel/. Accessed 28 October 2018.
    1. Conway, L., Gomez-Garibello, C., Talwar, V. & Shariff, S. (2016). Face-to-face and online: An investigation of children's and adolescents’ bullying behavior through the lens of moral emotions and judgments. Journal of School Violence, 15, 503-522.

LinkOut - more resources