Droplet digital PCR as an alternative to FISH for MYCN amplification detection in human neuroblastoma FFPE samples
- PMID: 30691436
- PMCID: PMC6348625
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5306-0
Droplet digital PCR as an alternative to FISH for MYCN amplification detection in human neuroblastoma FFPE samples
Abstract
Background: MYCN amplification directly correlates with the clinical course of neuroblastoma and poor patient survival, and serves as the most critical negative prognostic marker. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold standard for clinical diagnosis of MYCN status in neuroblastoma, its limitations warrant the identification of rapid, reliable, less technically challenging, and inexpensive alternate approaches.
Methods: In the present study, we examined the concordance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, in combination with immunohistochemistry, IHC) with FISH for MYCN detection in a panel of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human neuroblastoma samples.
Results: In 112 neuroblastoma cases, ddPCR analysis demonstrated a 96-100% concordance with FISH. Consistently, IHC grading revealed 92-100% concordance with FISH. Comparing ddPCR with IHC, we observed a concordance of 95-98%.
Conclusions: The results demonstrate that MYCN amplification status in NB cases can be assessed with ddPCR, and suggest that ddPCR could be a technically less challenging method of detecting MYCN status in FFPE specimens. More importantly, these findings illustrate the concordance between FISH and ddPCR in the detection of MYCN status. Together, the results suggest that rapid, less technically demanding, and inexpensive ddPCR in conjunction with IHC could serve as an alternate approach to detect MYCN status in NB cases, with near-identical sensitivity to that of FISH.
Keywords: FISH; Immunohistochemistry; MYCN amplification; Neuroblastoma; ddPCR.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All protocols were approved by the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Institutional Review Board with permission for the research use of de-identified specimens (
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures





References
-
- Marc TG, Gurney JG, Smith MA, Olshan AF: Sympathetic nervous system tumors. Cancer Incidence and Survival among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975–1995, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 1999, NIH Pub. No. 99–4649(ICCC IV):65–72.
-
- Gurney JG, Smith MA, Ross JA. Cancer among infants. Cancer Incidence and Survival among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975–1995. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 1999. pp. 149–156.
-
- Society AC . Cancer Facts & Figures 2017. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2017. pp. 1–56.
-
- Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse S, Kosary C, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). Bethesda, https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2009_pops09/, based on November 2011 SEER data submission: National Cancer Institute; 2017.