Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e026966.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026966.

Impacts of Brexit on fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease in England: a modelling study

Affiliations

Impacts of Brexit on fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease in England: a modelling study

Paraskevi Seferidi et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the potential impacts of different Brexit trade policy scenarios on the price and intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and consequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths in England between 2021 and 2030.

Design: Economic and epidemiological modelling study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Setting: The model combined publicly available data on F&V trade, published estimates of UK-specific price elasticities, national survey data on F&V intake, estimates on the relationship between F&V intake and CVD from published meta-analyses and CVD mortality projections for 2021-2030.

Participants: English adults aged 25 years and older.

Interventions: We modelled four potential post-Brexit trade scenarios: (1) free trading agreement with the EU and maintaining half of non-EU free trade partners; (2) free trading agreement with the EU but no trade deal with any non-EU countries; (3) no-deal Brexit; and (4) liberalised trade regime that eliminates all import tariffs.

Outcome measures: Cumulative coronary heart disease and stroke deaths attributed to the different Brexit scenarios modelled between 2021 and 2030.

Results: Under all Brexit scenarios modelled, prices of F&V would increase, especially for those highly dependent on imports. This would decrease intake of F&V between 2.5% (95% uncertainty interval: 1.9% to 3.1%) and 11.4% (9.5% to 14.2%) under the different scenarios. Our model suggests that a no-deal Brexit scenario would be the most harmful, generating approximately 12 400 (6690 to 23 390) extra CVD deaths between 2021 and 2030, whereas establishing a free trading agreement with the EU would have a lower impact on mortality, contributing approximately 5740 (2860 to 11 910) extra CVD deaths.

Conclusions: Trade policy under all modelled Brexit scenarios could increase price and decrease intake of F&V, generating substantial additional CVD mortality in England. The UK government should consider the population health implications of Brexit trade policy options, including changes to food systems.

Keywords: brexit; cardiovascular disease; diet; fruits and vegetables; trade policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated relative change in price of fruit and vegetable subgroups under each modelled Brexit scenario. Error bars indicate 95% uncertainty intervals. Scenario S1: free trading agreement with the EU and third countries; scenario S2: free trading agreement with the EU; scenario S3: no-deal Brexit; scenario S4: liberalised trade regime.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated number of cumulative CVD deaths for 2021–2030 associated with each modelled Brexit scenario by sex. Scenario S1: free trading agreement with the EU and third countries; scenario S2: free trading agreement with the EU; scenario S3: no-deal Brexit; scenario S4: liberalised trade regime. CVD, cardiovascular disease.

References

    1. Schram A, Ruckert A, VanDuzer JA, et al. . A conceptual framework for investigating the impacts of international trade and investment agreements on noncommunicable disease risk factors. Health Policy Plan 2018;33:123–36. 10.1093/heapol/czx133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friel S, Hattersley L, Snowdon W, et al. . Monitoring the impacts of trade agreements on food environments. Obes Rev 2013;14:120–34. 10.1111/obr.12081 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stuckler D, McKee M, Ebrahim S, et al. . Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001235 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001235 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker P, Friel S. Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia. Global Health 2016;12:80 10.1186/s12992-016-0223-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thow AM, Hawkes C. The implications of trade liberalization for diet and health: a case study from Central America. Global Health 2009;5:5 10.1186/1744-8603-5-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources