Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):35-39.
doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_737_17.

Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries

Affiliations

Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries

Chandni Sinha et al. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Infraclavicular approach is a common technique of brachial plexus block. The main difficulty of ultrasound guided technique is in needle visualization due to deep location of the cords. Hebbard et al described a retroclavicular approach wherein the needle was inserted posteriorly to the clavicle.

Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, we have compared the classical technique with the retroclavicular approach in terms of needle visibility, block success rate, number of needle passes, block performance time, procedure-related pain, complications, patient and operator comfort and satisfaction.

Results: The rate of block success was similar in both the groups. The needle tip and shaft visibility was more in the retroclavicular group (P < 0.05). The number of needle passes was also less in the retroclavicular group. Time for the block procedure was less in retroclavicular group when compared to the classical coracoid group. The patients reported less pain in retroclavicular group (P < 0.05).

Discussion: Retroclavicular approach is a feasible option of infraclavicular brachial plexus block in Indian Subpopulation in terms of needle visibility and block success rate.

Keywords: Coracoid approach; needle visibility; retroclavicular.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort statement
Figure 2
Figure 2
Block technique

References

    1. Charbonneau J, Fréchette Y, Sansoucy Y, Echave P. The ultrasound-guided retroclavicular block: A prospective feasibility study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:605–9. - PubMed
    1. Desroches J. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: An observational study of 150 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:253–7. - PubMed
    1. Macfarlane A, Anderson K. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Continuing education in anaesthesia. Crit Care Pain. 2009;9:139–43.
    1. Hebbard P, Royse C. Ultrasound guided posterior approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:539. - PubMed
    1. Kavrut ON, Kavakli AS. Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. J Anesth. 2017;31:572–8. - PubMed