Hepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018
- PMID: 30694166
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181995
Hepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for differentiating between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other (hepatic) malignancy (OM) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Materials and Methods From 2008 to 2017, 55 patients with untreated OM and liver cirrhosis were eligible for this retrospective case-control study (mean age, 58 years ± 10 [standard deviation] [range, 32-79 years], with 45 men [mean age, 58 years ± 11] and 10 women [mean age, 62 years ± 7]). Control subjects consisted of 165 treatment-naive patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis (mean age, 58 years ± 10 [range, 29-80 years], with 134 men [mean age, 58 years ± 9] and 31 women [mean age, 59 years ± 11]). Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently determined the presence of LR-M features and major HCC features (non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, and enhancing capsule). The diagnostic performances of each feature, the LR-M criteria (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC), and the LR-5 criteria (definitely HCC) were calculated and compared by using the generalized estimating equation method. Results Individual LR-M features had a sensitivity of 9%-71% and a specificity of 83%-97% for the diagnosis of OM. Major features of HCC had a sensitivity of 62%-83% and a specificity of 69%-89% for the diagnosis of HCC. The LR-M criteria had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 97%) for diagnosing OM, with a specificity of 48% (95% CI: 40%, 56%). The LR-5 criteria had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 67%, 81%) for diagnosing HCC, with a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 97%). The accuracy of the LR-5 criteria was higher than that of the LR-M criteria (78% [95% CI: 72%, 83%] vs 58% [95% CI: 52%, 65%], P <. 001). Conclusion The LR-5 criteria as well as the LR-M criteria can effectively distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Furlan in this issue.
Comment in
-
New Progress toward Validation of LI-RADS Version 2018.Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):81-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182890. Epub 2019 Jan 29. Radiology. 2019. PMID: 30694163 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Evaluation of Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):190-199. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203559. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Radiology. 2021. PMID: 33620289
-
Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules.J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 11. J Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29133247
-
How to utilize LR-M features of the LI-RADS to improve the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI?Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2408-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5893-1. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30552477
-
Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 Major Feature Combinations: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.Radiology. 2025 Jun;315(3):e243450. doi: 10.1148/radiol.243450. Radiology. 2025. PMID: 40492918
-
Cirrhotic liver: What's that nodule? The LI-RADS approach.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;43(2):281-94. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24937. Epub 2015 May 21. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016. PMID: 25996905 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS.Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 12;11:641195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641195. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33912456 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk patients matched to MR field strength: diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jul;46(7):3168-3178. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-02996-y. Epub 2021 Mar 3. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021. PMID: 33660040
-
Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study.Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1616-1626. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0363. Korean J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31854149 Free PMC article.
-
The Course of LIRADS 3 and 4 Hepatic Abnormalities as Correlated With Explant Pathology: A Single Center Experience.J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Jul-Aug;12(4):1048-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Mar 9. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35814502 Free PMC article.
-
New strategy for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M to improve diagnostic performance of MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jul;47(7):2289-2298. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03538-w. Epub 2022 May 6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022. PMID: 35523888
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical