Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr:236:22-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

A Systematic Review of Gender-Based Differences in Hirsch Index Among Academic Surgeons

Sara P Myers  1 , Katherine M Reitz  2 , Charles B Wessel  3 , Matthew D Neal  2 , Jennifer A Corbelli  4 , Leslie R M Hausmann  5 , Matthew R Rosengart  2
Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Gender-Based Differences in Hirsch Index Among Academic Surgeons

Sara P Myers et al. J Surg Res. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The h-index is a commonly used bibliometric in academic medicine which enumerates the number of publications (h) that have been cited h times. Recent investigations have suggested that gender-based differences in h-index may exist among academic physicians. We systematically reviewed studies of academic surgeons' h-index, hypothesizing that a significant difference would exist between the h-index of men and women at all academic ranks.

Methods: Peer-reviewed journal articles authored by academic surgeons of any subspecialization in the United States between January 1, 2006, and November 20, 2017, were reviewed. We excluded studies of trainees or gender-based differences in funding without mention of h-index. Two reviewers assessed article quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. Pooled estimates of standard mean differences (SMD) in h-index between genders were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses. A subgroup analysis based on the academic rank was performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analyses determined the effect of study on h-index. Meta-regression identified whether surgical specialty contributed to heterogeneity.

Results: Twelve articles comparing h-index between genders were selected from 7950. Men possessed higher h-indices than women (SMD, 0.547; P < 0.001; I2 = 89.5%). Men exhibited higher h-indices at the assistant rank (SMD, 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.24; P = 0.039) but not at the associate (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.33; P = 0.165) or full professor (SMD, 0.12; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.31; P = 0.25) ranks.

Conclusions: The h-index is higher for men than that for women in academic surgery overall but not at individual ranks. Further investigations are necessary to address limitations in h-index and to further characterize the relationship between h-index, gender, and promotion.

Keywords: Bibliometrics; Gender disparities; Hirsch index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1 –
Fig. 1 –
CONSORT flow diagram of study inclusion.
Fig. 2 –
Fig. 2 –
Assessment of publication bias. (Color version of figure is available online.)
Fig. 3 –
Fig. 3 –
Differences in h-index between men and women academic surgeons (A) overall, at the (B) assistant professor rank, (C) associate professor rank, and (D) full professor rank. SMD greater than 0 indicates women with lower h-index. (Color version of figure is available online.)
Fig. 4 –
Fig. 4 –
Sensitivity analysis for overall h-index.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahmed AA, Egleston B, Holliday E, Eastwick G, Takita C, Jagsi R. Gender trends in radiation oncology in the United States: a 30-year analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:33–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiss A, Lee KC, Tapia V, et al. Equity in surgical leadership for women: more work to do. Am J Surg. 2014;208:494–498. - PubMed
    1. Baldwin C, Chandran L, Gusic M. Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23:285–297. - PubMed
    1. Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco J Jr, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician- educators in the United States and Canada. A survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA. 1997;278:723–728. - PubMed
    1. Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinican-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:711–716. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types