Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 17:15:1-10.
doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S166157. eCollection 2019.

Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives

Suleyman Aydin  1 , Kader Ugur  2 , Suna Aydin  3 , İbrahim Sahin  1   4 , Meltem Yardim  1
Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives

Suleyman Aydin et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. .

Abstract

Purpose: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common cause of death in the world. Comprehensive risk assessment of patients presenting with chest pain and eliminating undesirable results should decrease morbidity and mortality rates, increase the quality of life of patients, and decrease health expenditure in many countries. In this study, the advantages and disadvantages of the enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers used in the diagnosis of patients with AMI are given in historical sequence, and some candidate biomarkers - hFABP, GPBB, S100, PAPP-A, RP, TNF, IL6, IL18, CD40 ligand, MPO, MMP9, cell-adhesion molecules, oxidized LDL, glutathione, homocysteine, fibrinogen, and D-dimer procalcitonin - with a possible role in the diagnosis of AMI are discussed.

Methods: The present study was carried out using meta-analyses, reviews of clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, and guidelines indexed in PubMed and Web of Science.

Results: These numerous AMI biomarkers guide clinical applications (diagnostic methods, risk stratification, and treatment). Today, however, TnI remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of AMI. Details in the text will be given of many biomarkers for the diagnosis of AMI.

Conclusion: We evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of routine enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers and the literature evidence of other candidate biomarkers in the diagnosis of AMI, and discuss challenges and constraints that limit translational use from bench to bedside.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; cardiac peptide; cardiac protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gross anatomy of heart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagnosis chart of AMI and possible physiological effects. Abbreviations: ECG, electrocardiography; AMI, acute myocardial infarction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Reindl M, Reinstadler SJ, Feistritzer HJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction as a manifestation of systemic vasculitis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016;128(21-22):841–843. - PubMed
    1. Haasenritter J, Stanze D, Widera G, et al. Does the patient with chest pain have a coronary heart disease? Diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs--a meta-analysis. Croat Med J. 2012;53(5):432–441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liakos M, Parikh PB. Gender disparities in presentation, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20(8):64. - PubMed
    1. Aydin S, Aydin S. Irisin concentrations as a myocardial biomarker. In: Patel VB, Preedy VR, editors. Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Disease. Dordrecht: Springer; 2016. pp. 489–504.
    1. Aydin S, Aydin S, Nesimi Eren M, et al. The cardiovascular system and the biochemistry of grafts used in heart surgery. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):612. - PMC - PubMed