Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;65(1):53-59.
doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy018. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Can house sparrows recognize familiar or kin-related individuals by scent?

Affiliations

Can house sparrows recognize familiar or kin-related individuals by scent?

Gerardo Fracasso et al. Curr Zool. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

In the last decades, higher attention has been paid to olfactory perception in birds. As a consequence, a handful of avian species have been discovered to use olfaction in different contexts. Nevertheless, we still have a very limited knowledge about the use of odor cues in avian social life, particularly, in the case of songbirds. Here, we investigate if female house sparrows Passer domesticus show any preference for the odor of kin and nonkin conspecifics and we also test a possible role of familiarity based on male scent in female choice. We performed the experiment with captive birds twice, during the nonbreeding and breeding seasons. Our results show that female house sparrows strongly avoided the odor of unrelated familiar (UF) males, both in the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Our results suggest recognition for olfactory stimuli related to familiarity and kinship. We suggest that avoidance for UF males is associated with previous experience in this species. Also, we provided further evidence to the use of olfaction in passerine species by using a new experimental setup.

Keywords: familiarity; house sparrow; kinship recognition; odor; olfaction, Passer domesticus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportion of time females (n = 12) spent in front of the body odor of a RF, UF, UU male and of a control. Both breeding and nonbreeding season are included (see Table 3 for the statistical analysis). Only time in the choice area was considered. Females showed a significant rejection for the odor cue of UF males. **P < 0.01. Error bars indicate ± SE.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amo L, Visser ME, Oers K, 2011. Smelling out predators is innate in birds. Ardea 99:177–184.
    1. Amo L, Avilés JM, Parejo D, Peña A, Rodríguez J. et al., 2012a. Sex recognition by odour and variation in the uropygial gland secretion in starlings. J Anim Ecol 81:605–613. - PubMed
    1. Amo L, López-Rull I, Pagán I, Garcia CM, 2012b. Male quality and conspecific scent preferences in the house finch Carpodacus mexicanus. Anim Behav 84:1483–1489.
    1. Amo L, Dicke M, Visser ME, 2016. Are naïve birds attracted to herbivore-induced plant defences? Behaviour 153:353–366.
    1. Anderson TR, 2006. Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow: From Genes to Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.