Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;65(1):89-97.
doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy058. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

Female indris determine the rhythmic structure of the song and sustain a higher cost when the chorus size increases

Affiliations

Female indris determine the rhythmic structure of the song and sustain a higher cost when the chorus size increases

Chiara De Gregorio et al. Curr Zool. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Among the behavioral traits shared by some nonhuman primate species and humans there is singing. Unfortunately, our understanding of animals' rhythmic abilities is still in its infancy. Indris are the only lemurs who sing and live in monogamous pairs, usually forming a group with their offspring. All adult members of a group usually participate in choruses that are emitted regularly and play a role in advertising territorial occupancy and intergroup spacing. Males and females emit phrases that have similar frequency ranges but may differ in their temporal structure. We examined whether the individuals' contribution to the song may change according to chorus size, the total duration of the song or the duration of the individual contribution using the inter-onset intervals within a phrase and between phrases. We found that the rhythmic structure of indri's songs depends on factors that are different for males and females. We showed that females have significantly higher variation in the rhythm of their contribution to the song and that, changes according to chorus size. Our findings indicate that female indris sustain a higher cost of singing than males when the number of singers increases. These results suggest that cross-species investigations will be crucial to understanding the evolutionary frame in which such sexually dimorphic traits occurred.

Keywords: chorus; coordination; duets; lemurs; singing; synchrony.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Map of the study area in the Maromizaha Forest. Minimum Convex Polygons (MCP) generated with ArcGIS 9.1 (Environmental System Research Inc.) correspond to 2016 home range of the study groups. Group ID is reported onto each MCP. (B) Spectrogram of the indris’ song generated using Praat. A reproductive pair is singing in the song. The initial portion is characterized by the emission of roars (shaded in orange), then the contribution of the male is highlighted in blue and female’s one in red. Song duration and contribution (for the male) are exemplified. Phonation, which is the cumulative duration of each note, is not shown. The small black dots indicate the area magnified in 1D. (C) A female indri from the Maromizaha Forest while singing. The natural marks (e.g., fur color pattern) are crucial for the identification of different individuals. (D) Schematic representation of the spectrogram of the isolated fundamental frequency of three DPs. The sound spectrogram displays time (s) on the x-axis, frequency (Hz) on the vertical axis. We describe acoustic parameter collection of bpIOI and wpIOI.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Interaction between contribution and phonation with bpIOI and wpIOI during the indris’ song (N = 119). The individual mean durations are 2.698 ± 0.705 s for the wpIOI, 2.219 ± 0.330 s for the bpIOI, 69.768 ± 32.452 s for contribution and 28.416 ± 11.096 s for phonation. The interaction is presented using the 3-dimensional surface (visreg package in R; Breheny and Burchett 2017; females in red A, E, J, C, G, and L; males in blue, B, F, K, D, H, and M).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Boxplot of the CV of bpIOI and wpIOI in the sexes (males in blue and females in red). The values shown are calculated from the average individual means. Paired t-test significance at P <0.001 is denoted by ***.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altmann J, 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267. - PubMed
    1. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ, 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J Mem Lang 68:255–278. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D, MäChler M, Bolker B, Walker S, 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48.
    1. Boersma P, Weenink D, 2016. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Computer program). Version 6.0.14 [cited 2016 March 2]. http://www.praat.org/.
    1. Bonadonna G, Torti V, Sorrentino R, Randrianarison RM, Zaccagno M. et al. 2017. Territory exclusivity and intergroup encounters in the indris (Mammalia: primates: indridae: indri indri) upon methodological tuning. Eur Zool J 84:238–251.