Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;20(2):238-246.
doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1554085. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

The required number of trials for biomechanical analysis of a golf swing

Affiliations

The required number of trials for biomechanical analysis of a golf swing

Anna C Severin et al. Sports Biomech. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The increasing interest in the biomechanical analysis of the golf swing warrants establishing the minimum number of trials required to obtain reliable data. Several such methods have been suggested previously for other movement tasks, and it has been shown that the number of required trials depends on the method used and on the task examined. This study aimed to compare three methods of reliability: a sequential average, intraclass correlations, and a modified version of the standard error of measurement (SEMind). Kinematic and kinetic data of 10 recreational golfers performing 15 shots with both a six-iron and a driver was collected using a ten-camera motion capture system and force platforms. Range-of-motion, velocity, joint moments, and ground reaction forces were extracted and analysed using the three methods. The sequential average method yielded the highest number of required trials (12), while the intraclass correlations and SEMind both resulted in lower numbers of required trials (4). Considering the variability between participants and strengths and limitations of the various methods, we conclude that 8 trials is sufficient for biomechanical analyses of a golf swing and recommend the SEMind method for determining how many swings should be collected.

Keywords: Reliability; kinematics; kinetics; movement stability; variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest and that no financial interest or benefit has arisen from the direct applications of this research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Image of a motion analysis model showing the key positions used in this study; A – start of backswing, B – end of backswing, and C – end of swing.

References

    1. Amiri-Khorasani M, Osman N, & Yusof A (2010). Kinematics analysis: Number of trials necessary to achieve performance stability during soccer instep kicking. Journal of Human Kinetics, 23, 15–19.
    1. Bates BT, Osternig LR, Sawhill JA, & James SL (1983). An assessment of subject variability, subject-shoe interaction, and the evaluation of running shoes using ground reaction force data. Journal of Biomechanics, 16(3), 181–191. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(83)90125-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Egret CI, Vincent O, Weber J, Dujardin FH, & Chollet D (2003). Analysis of 3d kinematics concerning three different clubs in golf swing. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(6), 465–470. doi:10.1055/s-2003-41175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gore SJ, Marshall BM, Franklyn-Miller AD, Falvey EC, & Moran KA (2016). The number of trials required to obtain a representative movement pattern during a hurdle hop exercise. Journal of applied biomechanics, 32(3), 295–300. doi:10.1123/jab.2015-0121 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gulgin H, Armstrong C, & Gribble P (2009). Hip rotational velocities during the full golf swing. Journal of sports science & medicine, 8(2), 296–299. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources