Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 30;21(1):e11297.
doi: 10.2196/11297.

Consumer Health Information Technology in the Prevention of Substance Abuse: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Consumer Health Information Technology in the Prevention of Substance Abuse: Scoping Review

Apoorva Milind Pradhan et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Addiction is one of the most rapidly growing epidemics that currently plagues nations around the world. In the United States, it has cost the government more than US $700 billion a year in terms of health care and other associated costs and is also associated with serious social, physical, and mental consequences. Increasing efforts have been made to tackle this issue at different levels, from primary prevention to rehabilitation across the globe. With the use of digital technology rapidly increasing, an effort to leverage the consumer health information technologies (CHITs) to combat the rising substance abuse epidemic has been underway. CHITs are identified as patient-focused technological platforms aimed to improve patient engagement in health care and aid them in navigating the complex health care system.

Objective: This review aimed to provide a holistic and overarching view of the breadth of research on primary prevention of substance abuse using CHIT conducted over nearly past five decades. It also aimed to map out the changing landscape of CHIT over this period.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley's modified methodological framework. We searched 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE). Papers were included if the studies addressed the use of CHIT for primary prevention of substance abuse and were published in English between 1809 and 2018. Studies that did not focus solely on primary prevention or assessed additional comorbid conditions were eliminated.

Results: Forty-two papers that met our inclusion criteria were included in the review. These studies were published between 1970 and 2018 and were not restricted by geography, age, race, or sex. The review mapped studies using the most commonly used CHIT platforms for substance abuse prevention from mass media in the 1970s to mobile and social media in 2018. Moreover, 191 studies that were exclusively focused on alcohol prevention were excluded and will be addressed in a separate paper. The studies included had diverse research designs although the majority were randomized controlled trials (RCT) or review papers. Many of the RCTs used interventions based on different behavioral theories such as family interactions, social cognitive theories, and harm-minimization framework.

Conclusions: This review found CHIT platforms to be efficacious and cost-effective in the real-world settings. We also observed a gradual shift in the types and use of CHIT platforms over the past few decades and mapped out their progression. In addition, the review detected a shift in consumer preferences and behaviors from face-to-face interactions to technology-based platforms. However, the studies included in this review only focused on the aspect of primary prevention. Future reviews could assess the effectiveness of platforms for secondary prevention and for prevention of substance abuse among comorbid populations.

Keywords: consumer health information technology; primary prevention; review; substance abuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart for literature search process and inclusion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Columbia CASA Center On Addiction. 2012. Addiction medicine: closing the gap between science and practice https://www.centeronaddiction.org/addiction-research/reports/addiction-m... .
    1. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2017. [2018-07-11]. Trends and Statistics https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics .
    1. American Addiction Centers. 2018. [2018-07-12]. Statistics on Drug Addiction https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/addiction-statistics/
    1. Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet. 2009 Jun 27;373(9682):2223–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7.S0140-6736(09)60746-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Atlanta https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/stateandcommunity/best_practices/pdfs/2014/c... .

Publication types

MeSH terms