Hybrid versus catheter ablation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis†
- PMID: 30698685
- DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy475
Hybrid versus catheter ablation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis†
Abstract
As the mechanisms underlying persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are still incompletely understood, a 'gold standard' strategy for ablation is lacking. The results of catheter ablation, independent of the ablation strategy applied, are disappointing. Hybrid ablation, combining a thoracoscopic epicardial and transvenous endocardial approach, has shown more favourable outcomes. To date, studies comparing both techniques are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of hybrid versus catheter ablation in patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. A systematic literature search of studies reporting on catheter and hybrid ablation of persistent or longstanding persistent AF was performed in the PubMed database. All identified articles were screened and checked for eligibility. A meta-analysis was performed on inter-study heterogeneity and pooled correlation between baseline characteristics, primary and secondary outcomes of hybrid and catheter studies. From the 520 articles identified by the search, 34 articles could be included in the analysis. Hybrid ablation resulted in higher freedom of atrial arrhythmias in patients with persistent and longstanding-persistent AF than catheter ablation (70.7% vs 49.9%, P < 0.001). Although hybrid ablation had a slightly higher complication rate than catheter ablation, overall morbidity and mortality were low. In conclusion, hybrid ablation is more effective than catheter ablation in maintaining the sinus rhythm in patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. However, data directly comparing both techniques are lacking, and small, heterogenic, single-arm studies in a random-effects model prevent definite conclusions from being drawn. Therefore, larger randomized controlled trials directly comparing both techniques are needed.
Keywords: Catheter ablation; Hybrid ablation; Persistent atrial fibrillation; Systematic review and meta-analysis.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HARTCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial.Trials. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3365-9. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31221218 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Ablation Versus Endocardial Catheter Ablation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;3(4):341-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Dec 21. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 29759446
-
Repeat Procedures After Hybrid Thoracoscopic Ablation in the Setting of Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiological Findings and 2-Year Clinical Outcome.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;27(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/jce.12837. Epub 2015 Nov 13. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26374195
-
Short- and long-term outcomes in isolated vs. hybrid thoracoscopic ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.Europace. 2024 Oct 3;26(10):euae232. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae232. Europace. 2024. PMID: 39255332 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical and concomitant epicardial-endocardial (hybrid) ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;40(6):245-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 6. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25979830 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between biparietal bipolar and uniparietal bipolar radio frequency ablation techniques in a simultaneous procedural setting.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;61(3):567-575. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00852-5. Epub 2020 Aug 24. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 32833110 Free PMC article.
-
Epicardial and Endocardial Validation of Conduction Block After Thoracoscopic Epicardial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.Innovations (Phila). 2020 Nov/Dec;15(6):525-531. doi: 10.1177/1556984520956314. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Innovations (Phila). 2020. PMID: 33052065 Free PMC article.
-
Atrial fibrillation: a contemporary update.Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Sep;23(5):437-441. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-23.5.Cardio2. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Clin Med (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37775166 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter options for atrial fibrillation treatment: an overview of the ablative techniques currently available and future perspectives.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jan 30;13(1):31-43. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-afm-0060. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38380136 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unilateral left-sided thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation concomitant to minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Oct 4;62(5):ezac409. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac409. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35947693 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials