Advancing implementation frameworks with a mixed methods case study in child behavioral health
- PMID: 30698775
- PMCID: PMC7413184
- DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz005
Advancing implementation frameworks with a mixed methods case study in child behavioral health
Abstract
Despite a growing policy push for the provision of services based on evidence, evidence-based treatments for children and youth with mental health challenges have poor uptake, yielding limited benefit. With a view to improving implementation in child behavioral health, we investigated a complementary implementation approach informed by three implementation frameworks in the context of implementing motivational interviewing in four child and youth behavioral health agencies: the Active Implementation Frameworks (AIF) (process), the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (factors), and the Implementation Outcomes Framework (evaluation). The study design was mixed methods with embedded interrupted time series and motivational interviewing (MI) fidelity was the primary outcome. Focus groups and field notes informed perspectives on the implementation approach, and a questionnaire explored the salience of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) factors. Findings validate the process guidance provided by the AIF and highlight CIFR factors related to implementation success. Novel CFIR factors, not elsewhere reported in the literature, are identified that could potentially extend the framework if validated in future research. Introducing fidelity measurement in practice proved challenging and was not sustained beyond the study. A complementary implementation approach was successful in implementing MI in child behavioral health agencies. In contrast with the typical train and hope approach to implementation, practice change did not occur immediately post-training but emerged over a 7 month period of consultation and practice following a discrete interactive training period. The saliency of CFIR constructs aligned with findings from studies conducted in other contexts, demonstrating external validity and highlighting common factors that can focus planning and measurement.
Keywords: Active Implementation Frameworks; Child behavioral health; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Implementation science; Motivational interviewing.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
References
-
- Weisz JR, Doss AJ, Hawley KM. Youth psychotherapy outcome research: a review and critique of the evidence base. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:337–363. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141449. - PubMed
-
- Government of Australia. 2001. Australian General Practice Network. Better outcomes in mental health care initiative Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-boimhc. Accessed December 27, 2018.
-
- Government of Ontario. 2011. Open Minds, Healthy Minds: Ontario’s Comprehensive Mental Health & Addictions Strategy Available at http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/common/ministry/publications/reports/ment.... Accessed December 27, 2018.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.
-
- Government of Canada. Out of the Shadows at Last: Transforming Mental Health, Mental Illness, and Addiction Services in Canada. Final Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2006. Available at https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/sites/default/files/out_of_the_sha.... Accessed December 27, 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
