Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0210191.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210191. eCollection 2019.

A tactical comparison of the 4-2-3-1 and 3-5-2 formation in soccer: A theory-oriented, experimental approach based on positional data in an 11 vs. 11 game set-up

Affiliations

A tactical comparison of the 4-2-3-1 and 3-5-2 formation in soccer: A theory-oriented, experimental approach based on positional data in an 11 vs. 11 game set-up

Daniel Memmert et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The presented field experiment in an 11 vs. 11 soccer game set-up is the first to examine the impact of different formations (e.g. 4-2-3-1 vs. 3-5-2) on tactical key performance indicators (KPIs) using positional data in a controlled experiment. The data were gathered using player tracking systems (1 Hz) in a standardized 11 vs. 11 soccer game. The KPIs were measured using dynamical positioning variables like Effective Playing Space, Player Length per Width ratio, Team Separateness, Space Control Gain, and Pressure Passing Efficiency. Within the experimental positional data analysis paradigm, neither of the team formations showed differences in Effective Playing Space, Team Separateness, or Space Control Gain. However, as a theory-based approach predicted, a 3-5-2 formation for the Player Length per Width ratio and Pressure Passing Efficiency exceeded the 4-2-3-1 formation. Practice task designs which manipulate team formations therefore significantly influence the emergent behavioral dynamics and need to be considered when planning and monitoring performance. Accordingly, an experimental positional data analysis paradigm is a useful approach to enable the development and validation of theory-oriented models in the area of performance analysis in sports games.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic representation of the soccer pitch and experimental setup before trial initiation (1 –Transponder, 2 –Mobile Action Cam, 3 –Stationary Cams).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Schematic of three performance indicators: Effective Playing Space (EPS) which is the convex hull of the players (A), Player Length per Width (PLpW) (BC), determined as the ratio of team length B to team width C, and Team Separateness as the average distance between the attackers and their respective closest defender (D).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Pressure Passing Efficiency Index, Blue: Attackers, Red: Defenders.
d1 = distance between ball carrier and closest defender, d2 = distance between receiving player and closest defender.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mackenzie R, Cushion C. Performance analysis in football: a critical review and implications for future research. J Sport Sci. 2013;31(6): 639–676. - PubMed
    1. Glazier PS. Towards a Grand Unified Theory of sports performance. Hum Movement Sci. 2017;56(Part A): 136–156. 10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rein R, Perl R, Memmert D. Maybe a tad early for a Grand Unified theory: Commentary on “Towards a Grand Unified Theory of sports performance” by Paul S. Glazier. Hum Movement Sci. 2017;56: 173–175. - PubMed
    1. Rein R, Memmert D. Big data and tactical analysis in elite soccer: future challenges and opportunities for sports science. SpringerPlus. 2016;5: 1410 10.1186/s40064-016-3108-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Memmert D, Raabe D. Data Analytics in Football Positional Data Collection, Modelling and Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018.

Publication types