Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Jan 30;16(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0776-7.

Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study

Miriam Alvarado et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization has advocated for sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes as part of a broader non-communicable disease prevention strategy, and these taxes have been recently introduced in a wide range of settings. However, much is still unknown about how SSB taxes operate in various contexts and as a result of different tax designs. In 2015, the Government of Barbados implemented a 10% ad valorem (value-based) tax on SSBs. It has been hypothesized that this tax structure may inadvertently encourage consumers to switch to cheaper sugary drinks. We aimed to assess whether and to what extent there has been a change in sales of SSBs following implementation of the SSB tax.

Methods: We used electronic point of sale data from a major grocery store chain and applied an interrupted time series (ITS) design to assess grocery store SSB and non-SSB sales from January 2013 to October 2016. We controlled for the underlying time trend, seasonality, inflation, tourism and holidays. We conducted sensitivity analyses using a cross-country control (Trinidad and Tobago) and a within-country control (vinegar). We included a post-hoc stratification by price tertile to assess the extent to which consumers may switch to cheaper sugary drinks.

Results: We found that average weekly sales of SSBs decreased by 4.3% (95%CI 3.6 to 4.9%) compared to expected sales without a tax, primarily driven by a decrease in carbonated SSBs sales of 3.6% (95%CI 2.9 to 4.4%). Sales of non-SSBs increased by 5.2% (95%CI 4.5 to 5.9%), with bottled water sales increasing by an average of 7.5% (95%CI 6.5 to 8.3%). The sensitivity analyses were consistent with the uncontrolled results. After stratifying by price, we found evidence of substitution to cheaper SSBs.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the Barbados SSB tax was associated with decreased sales of SSBs in a major grocery store chain after controlling for underlying trends. This finding was robust to sensitivity analyses. We found evidence to suggest that consumers may have changed their behaviour in response to the tax by purchasing cheaper sugary drinks, in addition to substituting to untaxed products. This has important implications for the design of future SSB taxes.

Keywords: Diabetes prevention; Evaluation; Fiscal policy; Obesity prevention; Sugar-sweetened beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable (no individual human data was collected or used).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of any funding agencies.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Grocery Store Sales (mL/capita/week), January 2013–October 2016
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Volume of SSBs and non-SSBS sold in Barbados, by price tertile January 2013-October 2016
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Volume of product sub-categories sold in Barbados, by price tertile January 2013-October 2016

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nishtar S, Niinistö S, Sirisena M, Vázquez T, Skvortsova V, Rubinstein A, et al. Time to deliver: report of the WHO independent high-level commission on NCDs. Lancet. 2018;392(10143):245–252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31258-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horton R, Sargent J. 2018 must be the year for action against NCDs. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;391(10134):1971–1973. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30674-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Tackling NCDs:‘best buys’ and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of noncommunicable. diseases. 2017.
    1. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres J-P, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2477–2483. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1079. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, Mursu J, Hayashino Y, Bhupathiraju SN, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(8):496–504. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-h3576rep. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types