Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e024551.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024551.

Feasibility and acceptability of telehealth coaching to promote healthy eating in chronic kidney disease: a mixed-methods process evaluation

Jaimon T Kelly  1 , Molly M Warner  1 , Marguerite Conley  2 , Dianne P Reidlinger  1 , Tammy Hoffmann  3 , Jonathan Craig  4   5 , Allison Tong  5   6 , Marina Reeves  7 , David W Johnson  8   9   10 , Suetonia Palmer  11 , Katrina L Campbell  1   2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Feasibility and acceptability of telehealth coaching to promote healthy eating in chronic kidney disease: a mixed-methods process evaluation

Jaimon T Kelly et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a personalised telehealth intervention to support dietary self-management in adults with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Design: Mixed-methods process evaluation embedded in a randomised controlled trial.

Participants: People with stage 3-4 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]15-60 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Setting: Participants were recruited from three hospitals in Australia and completed the intervention in ambulatory community settings.

Intervention: The intervention group received one telephone call per fortnight and 2-8 tailored text messages for 3 months, and then 4-12 tailored text messages for 3 months without telephone calls. The control group received usual care for 3 months then non-tailored education-only text messages for 3 months.

Main outcome measures: Feasibility (recruitment, non-participation and retention rates, intervention fidelity and participant adherence) and acceptability (questionnaire and semistructured interviews).

Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.

Results: Overall, 80/230 (35%) eligible patients who were approached consented to participate (mean±SD age 61.5±12.6 years). Retention was 93% and 98% in the intervention and control groups, respectively, and 96% of all planned intervention calls were completed. All participants in the intervention arm identified the tailored text messages as useful in supporting dietary self-management. In the control group, 27 (69%) reported the non-tailored text messages were useful in supporting change. Intervention group participants reported that the telehealth programme delivery methods were practical and able to be integrated into their lifestyle. Participants viewed the intervention as an acceptable, personalised alternative to face-face clinic consultations, and were satisfied with the frequency of contact.

Conclusions: This telehealth-delivered dietary coaching programme is an acceptable intervention which appears feasible for supporting dietary self-management in stage 3-4 CKD. A larger-scale randomised controlled trial is needed to evaluate the efficacy of the coaching programme on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12616001212448; Results.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; diet; process evaluation; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram showing the flow of participants through the Evaluation of iNdividualized Telehealth Intensive Coaching to promote healthy Eating and lifestyle in Chronic Kidney Disease study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bello AK, Levin A, Tonelli M, et al. . Assessment of global kidney health care status. JAMA 2017;317:1864–81. 10.1001/jama.2017.4046 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen T, Harris DC. Challenges of chronic kidney disease prevention. Med J Aust 2015;203:209–10. 10.5694/mja15.00241 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steiber AL. Chronic kidney disease: considerations for nutrition interventions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014;38:418–26. 10.1177/0148607114527315 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ash S, Campbell KL, Bogard J, et al. . Nutrition prescription to achieve positive outcomes in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Nutrients 2014;6:416–51. 10.3390/nu6010416 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly JT, Rossi M, Johnson DW, et al. . Beyond sodium, phosphate and potassium: potential dietary interventions in kidney disease. Semin Dial 2017;30:197–202. 10.1111/sdi.12580 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types