School-based educational and on-site vaccination intervention among adolescents: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 30700487
- PMCID: PMC6357342
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025113
School-based educational and on-site vaccination intervention among adolescents: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: Childhood vaccination programmes have been established in all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries; however, measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) as well as diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio (Tdap-IPV) vaccination rates are not optimal in adolescents. Education in combination with easy access vaccination may be a promising approach to improve vaccination rates. We aim at improving MMR and Tdap-IPV rates in a school setting in the context of a planned cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT), the present paper describes the detailed protocol of this trial.
Methods and analysis: We will conduct a school-based cRCT, where schools will be randomised to either an educational condition addressing knowledge, risk communication and enhancing self-efficacy regarding vaccination or a low-intensity information condition. In both conditions, a bus equipped with medical staff and materials, will be delivering MMR and Tdap-IPV vaccine directly after the intervention. Schools in the city centre of Berlin, Germany, will be stratified by percentage of migration and type of school. Primary outcome is the number of students who receive vaccination in the bus. Secondary outcomes are knowledge and self-efficacy. An estimated sample size of 355 school classes with approximately 25 students per class is required. The planned analyses will take the nested structure of students, classes and schools into account.
Ethics and dissemination: The study will be performed according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was obtained by the local ethics committee. Parents of all students will be informed in advance. Their written consent will be obtained, in case students are underage. For dissemination, we will engage with governmental organisations to create potential of our educational unit to be included in future public health prevention schemes.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN18026662;Pre-results.
Keywords: immunization; measles; mobile health; prevention.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
A school-based educational on-site vaccination intervention for adolescents in an urban area in Germany: feasibility and psychometric properties of instruments in a pilot study.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12443-8. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35012511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Increasing vaccinations through an on-site school-based education and vaccination program: A city-wide cluster randomized controlled trial.Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 Aug;16(3):1326-1348. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12528. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024. PMID: 38299711 Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity of a low-dose diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis combination vaccine with either inactivated or oral polio vaccine compared to standard-dose diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis when used as a pre-school booster in UK children: A 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled study.Vaccine. 2015 Aug 26;33(36):4579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.105. Epub 2015 Jul 10. Vaccine. 2015. PMID: 26165918 Clinical Trial.
-
New combination vaccines: DTaP-IPV (Kinrix) and DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel).Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):515-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M468. Ann Pharmacother. 2010. PMID: 20197476 Review.
-
Acellular pertussis vaccine use in risk groups (adolescents, pregnant women, newborns and health care workers): a review of evidences and recommendations.Vaccine. 2012 Jul 27;30(35):5179-90. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jun 15. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 22709953 Review.
Cited by
-
A school-based educational on-site vaccination intervention for adolescents in an urban area in Germany: feasibility and psychometric properties of instruments in a pilot study.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12443-8. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35012511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Predicting herd immunity achievement: a time-series analysis of vaccination and fatality rates using 1,075 days of COVID-19 data.Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 20;12:1403163. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403163. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39371208 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). [Vaccination rates in Germany 2015] Impfquoten bei der Schuleingangsuntersuchung in Deutschland 2015. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2017;16:137–48.
-
- UNICEF. Immunization coverage and system performance indicator data: UNICEF, 2018.
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Measles and Rubella Surveillance data. Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
-
- Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). [Vaccination rates in Germany 2008] Impfquoten bei der Schuleingangsuntersuchung in Deutschland 2008. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2010;16:137–46.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical