Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):953.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37304-0.

Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur

Affiliations

Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur

Wenche Aas et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur.
    Aas W, Mortier A, Bowersox V, Cherian R, Faluvegi G, Fagerli H, Hand J, Klimont Z, Galy-Lacaux C, Lehmann CMB, Myhre CL, Myhre G, Olivié D, Sato K, Quaas J, Rao PSP, Schulz M, Shindell D, Skeie RB, Stein A, Takemura T, Tsyro S, Vet R, Xu X. Aas W, et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62441-w. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32205844 Free PMC article.

Abstract

The profound changes in global SO2 emissions over the last decades have affected atmospheric composition on a regional and global scale with large impact on air quality, atmospheric deposition and the radiative forcing of sulfate aerosols. Reproduction of historical atmospheric pollution levels based on global aerosol models and emission changes is crucial to prove that such models are able to predict future scenarios. Here, we analyze consistency of trends in observations of sulfur components in air and precipitation from major regional networks and estimates from six different global aerosol models from 1990 until 2015. There are large interregional differences in the sulfur trends consistently captured by the models and observations, especially for North America and Europe. Europe had the largest reductions in sulfur emissions in the first part of the period while the highest reduction came later in North America and East Asia. The uncertainties in both the emissions and the representativity of the observations are larger in Asia. However, emissions from East Asia clearly increased from 2000 to 2005 followed by a decrease, while in India a steady increase over the whole period has been observed and modelled. The agreement between a bottom-up approach, which uses emissions and process-based chemical transport models, with independent observations gives an improved confidence in the understanding of the atmospheric sulfur budget.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ensemble modeled and observed trends of sulfate in aerosols over the period 1990–2015 compared to the trend in emissions over the same period. The upper left panel includes a striped green part indicating possible overestimated emissions in China, and the dotted black line in the East Asia panel shows an alternative emission trend adjusted from more recent inventories,. The time series show the annual values for years given. The uncertainty is illustrated using the standard deviation of the bootstrap trend for each region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Absolute (left) and relative (right) trends of air concentrations and wet deposition calculated by the EMEP MSC-W model with observed trends superimposed (open circles), of SO2 (a) and sulfate in aerosol (b) and wet deposition of sulfate (c) over the 1990–2015 period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative trends in sulfate concentrations in aerosol for 1990–2015, calculated by the individual and ensemble models, with the observed trends superimposed (open circles). The differences between the models are shown in the inter-model variability map.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the relative trends in sulfate concentrations in aerosol calculated by the different global models at sites with observed trends in the selected periods. The error bars indicate the standard deviation between the sites.

References

    1. Hoesly RM, et al. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) Geosci. Model Dev. 2018;11:369–408. doi: 10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018. - DOI
    1. Maas, R. & Grennfelt, P. E. (Eds.) Towards Cleaner Air. Scientific Assessment Report 2016, EMEP Steering Body and Working Group on Effects of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/lrtap/ExecutiveBody/35th_session... (Oslo, 2016).
    1. UNECE. Towards Cleaner Air. Scientific Assessment Report 2016: North America. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2016/AIR/Publications/... (Geneva, 2016).
    1. Reis S, et al. From Acid Rain to Climate Change. Science. 2012;338:1153–1154. doi: 10.1126/science.1226514. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vestreng V, Myhre G, Fagerli H, Reis S, Tarrasón L. Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007;7:3663–3681. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-3663-2007. - DOI

Publication types