Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;56(4):226-232.
doi: 10.5152/tao.2017.2337. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

Comparison of Different Treatment Methods for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Affiliations

Comparison of Different Treatment Methods for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Tolgahan Toroslu et al. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of different therapies for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and prognostic factors, and determine the most successful treatment according to the audiogram type and time from onset to treatment.

Methods: A total of 90 cases from February 2009 to January 2015 were classified under Group I oral treatment (methylprednisolone, acyclovir, betahistine-dihydrochloride, and vitamin B12); Group II oral treatment + intratympanic steroids (ITS); Group III oral treatment + hyperbaric oxygen; and Group IV only ITS. A pure tone average (PTA) improvement of less than 10 dB was assessed as "no improvement," a PTA of 10 dB or more or a 10% or more increase in the speech discrimination score (SDS) as "partial improvement," and a hearing threshold within 10 dB and SDS within 5%-10% of the unaffected ear as "full improvement."

Results: Overall, 32.2% patients showed full and 28.9% showed partial improvement, whereas 38.9% showed no improvement. There was no significant difference in terms of mean hearing gain between the different treatment methods. As the degree of hearing loss and time from onset to treatment increased, improvement worsened (p<0.05). Descending audiogram had lower mean hearing gains compared to other groups (p=0.014). There was no significant effect of age, sex, tinnitus and/or vertigo, and systemic disease on treatment success (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The most important factors affecting prognosis were the time from onset to treatment, hearing loss severity, and audiogram type. Only ITS avoided side effects and reduced hospitalization. ITS in the first two weeks, followed by hyperbaric oxygen were considered as the treatment priority.

Keywords: Sudden hearing loss; hyperbaric oxygen therapy; intratympanic injection; steroids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a–d. Audiogram types; (a) bowl type audigram, (b) ascending type audiogram, (c) flat type audiogram (d) descending type audiogram

References

    1. Lamm K, Lamm C, Arnold W. Effect of isobaric oxygen versus hyperbaric oxygen on the normal and noise damaged hypoxic and ischemic guinea pig inner ear. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;54:59–85. doi: 10.1159/000059054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stachler RJ, Chandrasekhar SS, Archer SM, Rosenfeld RM, Schwartz SR, Barrs DM, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Sudden hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(3 Suppl):1–35. doi: 10.1177/0194599812436449. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lazarini PR, Camargo AC. İdiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Etiopathogenic aspects. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72:554–61. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31004-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shikowitz MJ. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Med Clin North Am. 1991;75:1239–50. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30384-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haberkamp TJ, Tanyeri HM. Management of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Am J Otol. 1999;20:587–92. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources