The Role of Additional Spine Surgery in the Management of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, and Intractable Pain in the Setting of Previous or Concurrent Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications and Outcomes
- PMID: 30703586
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.091
The Role of Additional Spine Surgery in the Management of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, and Intractable Pain in the Setting of Previous or Concurrent Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications and Outcomes
Abstract
Objective: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is both relatively safe and reversible. Although SCS is generally regarded as a last resort, some of these patients will undergo additional spinal surgery after the device has been implanted or after its removal. We present a descriptive study of subsequent spinal surgery after SCS implantation.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who had undergone percutaneous or paddle SCS lead placement at our institution from 2009 to 2016 was performed. Patients who had only undergone trials or who had not undergone spine surgery after SCS implantation were excluded.
Results: We identified 22 patients (5.7%) who had undergone spine surgery during the course of SCS treatment or after SCS removal, or both, of a total 383 patients who had undergone paddle and/or percutaneous SCS implantation. The most common additional spine interventions included lumbosacral decompression and fusion (n = 15; 42%). Of 36 surgeries, the most frequent indications for subsequent intervention were stenosis or restenosis (n = 16; 73%) and spine deformity (n = 6; 27%). The median EuroQol-5D index was 0.397 preoperatively and 0.678 postoperatively.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe spine surgery in the setting of SCS implantation. Our results have indicated that spine surgery subsequent to, or concurrent with, SCS implantation appears to occur in few patients. Our study results suggest a modest improvement in quality of life outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should remember that patients might require further spine surgery despite the use of SCS implantation and, thus, might require reevaluation by the spine team.
Keywords: Complex regional pain syndrome; Failed back surgery syndrome; Intractable pain; Repeat spine surgery; Spinal cord stimulation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain.Spine J. 2001 Sep-Oct;1(5):358-63. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00083-3. Spine J. 2001. PMID: 14588316
-
Fantastic Four: Age, Spinal Cord Stimulator Waveform, Pain Localization and History of Spine Surgery Influence the Odds of Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial.Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):E19-E30. Pain Physician. 2020. PMID: 32013285 Clinical Trial.
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome: Outcome of a Prospective Case Series.Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):495-503. doi: 10.1111/ner.12769. Epub 2018 Mar 22. Neuromodulation. 2018. PMID: 29566313
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023;135:179-195. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_29. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023. PMID: 38153468
-
Effectiveness of cervical spinal cord stimulation for the management of chronic pain.Neuromodulation. 2014 Apr;17(3):265-71; discussion 271. doi: 10.1111/ner.12119. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Neuromodulation. 2014. PMID: 24112709 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Sagittal Spinopelvic Balance in Spinal Cord Stimulator Patients.Neuromodulation. 2022 Jul;25(5):775-782. doi: 10.1111/ner.13481. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Neuromodulation. 2022. PMID: 35803682 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical