Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary
- PMID: 30704406
- PMCID: PMC6357359
- DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-3707-y
Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary
Abstract
Although short-range large-droplet transmission is possible for most respiratory infectious agents, deciding on whether the same agent is also airborne has a potentially huge impact on the types (and costs) of infection control interventions that are required.The concept and definition of aerosols is also discussed, as is the concept of large droplet transmission, and airborne transmission which is meant by most authors to be synonymous with aerosol transmission, although some use the term to mean either large droplet or aerosol transmission.However, these terms are often used confusingly when discussing specific infection control interventions for individual pathogens that are accepted to be mostly transmitted by the airborne (aerosol) route (e.g. tuberculosis, measles and chickenpox). It is therefore important to clarify such terminology, where a particular intervention, like the type of personal protective equipment (PPE) to be used, is deemed adequate to intervene for this potential mode of transmission, i.e. at an N95 rather than surgical mask level requirement.With this in mind, this review considers the commonly used term of 'aerosol transmission' in the context of some infectious agents that are well-recognized to be transmissible via the airborne route. It also discusses other agents, like influenza virus, where the potential for airborne transmission is much more dependent on various host, viral and environmental factors, and where its potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated.
Keywords: Aerosol; Airborne; Droplet; Infection; Transmission.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not required. No individual patient information is included. Only previously published papers are discussed.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures

References
-
- CIDRAP (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy). Commentary: Protecting health workers from airborne MERS-CoV—learning from SARS https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/infection-prevention-control.html. Accessed 9 August 2017.
-
- CIDRAP (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy). Commentary: Health workers need optimal respiratory protection for Ebola https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html. Accessed 9 August 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical