Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;29(1):81-88.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054686. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Estimating the long-run relationship between state cigarette taxes and county life expectancy

Affiliations

Estimating the long-run relationship between state cigarette taxes and county life expectancy

Aaron Baum et al. Tob Control. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: While a large body of literature suggests that tobacco control legislation-including fiscal measures such as excise taxes-effectively reduces tobacco smoking, the long-run (10+ years) relationship between cigarettes excise taxes and life expectancy has not been directly evaluated. Here, we test the hypothesis that increases in state cigarette excise taxes are positively associated with long-run increases in population-level life expectancy.

Methods: We studied age-standardised life expectancy among all US counties from 1996 to 2012 by sex, in relation to state cigarette excise tax rates by year, controlling for other demographic, socioeconomic and county-specific features. We used an error-correction model to assess the long-run relationship between taxes and life expectancy. We additionally examine whether the relationship between cigarette taxes and life expectancy was mediated by changes to county smoking prevalence and varied by the sex, income and rural/urban composition of a county.

Results: For every one-dollar increase in cigarette tax per pack (in 2016 dollars), county life expectancy increased by 1 year (95% CI 0.60 to 1.40 years) over the long run, with the first 6-month increase in life expectancy taking 10 years to materialise. The association was mediated by changes in smoking prevalence and the magnitude of the association steadily increased as county income decreased.

Conclusions: Results suggest that increasing cigarette excise tax rates translates to consequential population-level improvements in life expectancy, with larger effects in low-income counties.

Keywords: public policy; smoking caused disease; taxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average and state-specific trends in state cigarette tax rates, 1996–2012. Inflation-adjusted (2016 dollars) changes in national average (orange) and state-specific cigarette taxes per pack of 20 during the study period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Long-run association of cigarette taxes and county-level life expectancy. Long-run changes in life expectancy at the county level by subgroup from the main regression analysis with adjustment for county-year income per capita, share female, share black, share over 65, share under 18 and share with high school, and fixed effects for county. 95% CIs reflect Huber-White robust SEs clustered at the state level. Positive values represent increases in life expectancy. Cigarette tax dollars are inflation-adjusted to 2016 year dollars. Income Q1–5 correspond to quintiles of county income per capita. Vertical dashed line is overall average effect.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Long-run association of cigarette taxes and smoking prevalence. Long-run changes in smoking prevalence at the county level by subgroup from the main regression analysis with adjustment for county-year income per capita, share female, share black, share over 65, share under 18 and share with high school, and fixed effects for county. 95% CIs reflect Huber-White robust SEs clustered at the state level. Positive values represent increases in life expectancy. Cigarette tax dollars are inflation-adjusted to 2016 year dollars. Income Q1–5 correspond to quintiles of county income per capita. Vertical dashed line is overall average effect.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chetty R, Cutler D, Stepner M. Effects of local health interventions on inequality in life expectancy: new publicly available data. Am J Public Health 2016;106:2154–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000058. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lantz PM, Jacobson PD, Warner KE, et al. Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control 2000;9:47–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control 2012;21:172–80. - PubMed
    1. Hu TW, Sung HY, Keeler TE. Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1218–22. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types