Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;25(1):23-45.
doi: 10.1177/1356389018803219. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation

Affiliations

From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation

Graham F Moore et al. Evaluation (Lond). 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Complex systems approaches to social intervention research are increasingly advocated. However, there have been few attempts to consider how models of intervention science, such as the UK's Medical Research Council complex interventions framework, might be reframed through a complex systems lens. This article identifies some key areas in which this framework might be reconceptualized, and a number of priority areas where further development is needed if alignment with a systems perspective is to be achieved. We argue that a complex systems perspective broadens the parameters of 'relevant' evidence and theory for intervention development, before discussing challenges in defining feasibility in dynamic terms. We argue that whole systems evaluations may be neither attainable, nor necessary; acknowledgment of complexity does not mean that evaluations must be complex, or investigate all facets of complexity. However, a systems lens may add value to evaluation design through guiding identification of key uncertainties, and informing decisions such as timings of follow-up assessments.

Keywords: complex interventions; complex systems; evaluation; methodology; population health; social intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, et al. (2017) Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: Exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open 7(2). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aveyard P, Lewis A, Teame S, et al. (2016) Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial. The Lancet 388, no. 10059 (2016): 2492–500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch CE, Sliepcevich EM, Gold RS, et al. (1985) Avoiding type III errors in health education program evaluations: A case study. Health Education Quarterly 12(3): 315–31. - PubMed
    1. Bonell C, Allen E, Christie D, et al. (2014. a) Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 15(1): 381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, et al. (2012) Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Social Science & Medicine 75(12): 2299–306. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources