A Qualitative Study Examining Stakeholder Perspectives of a Local Child Abuse Program in Community Emergency Departments
- PMID: 30707955
- PMCID: PMC6502662
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.006
A Qualitative Study Examining Stakeholder Perspectives of a Local Child Abuse Program in Community Emergency Departments
Abstract
Objective: Emergency department (ED) providers may fail to recognize or report child abuse and/or neglect (CAN). To improve recognition and reporting, we designed the Community ED CAN Program, in which teams of local clinicians (nurses, physicians, physician assistants) received training in CAN and 1) disseminated evidence-based education; 2) provided consultation, case follow-up, and access to specialists; and 3) facilitated multidisciplinary case review. The aims of this study were to understand the Program's strengths andchallenges and to explore factors that influenced implementation.
Methods: We used a qualitative research design with semistructured, one-on-one interviews to understand key stakeholders' perspectives of the Community ED CAN Program. We interviewed 27 stakeholders at 3 community hospitals and 1 academic medical center. Researchers analyzed transcribed data using constant comparative method of grounded theory and developed themes.
Results: Program strengths included 1) comfort in seeking help from local champions, 2) access to CAN experts, 3) increased CAN education/awareness, and 4) improved networks and communication. Facilitators of implementation included: 1) leadership support, 2) engaged local champions and external change agents (eg, CAN experts), 3) positive attributes of the champions, and 4) implementation flexibility. Program challenges/barriers to implementation included 1) variability of institutional support for the champions and 2) variability in awareness about the program.
Conclusions: A Community ED CAN Program has the potential to improve recognition and reporting of CAN. Key steps to facilitate implementation include the identification of committed local champions, strong leadership support, connections to experts, program publicity, and support of the champions' time.
Keywords: champions; child abuse; community of practice; emergency department.
Copyright © 2019 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest:
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Detecting Child Abuse and Neglect in General Emergency Departments.Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;66(5):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Ann Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 26231409
-
Implementation of the guidelines for targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest: a longitudinal qualitative study of barriers and facilitators perceived by hospital resuscitation champions.BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 5;6(1):e009261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009261. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 26733568 Free PMC article.
-
A preliminary report of knowledge translation: lessons from taking screening and brief intervention techniques from the research setting into regional systems of care.Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00516.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 20053242
-
How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):1021-1031. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009082. Epub 2019 Jul 29. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019. PMID: 31358686 Free PMC article.
-
The role of champions in the implementation of technology in healthcare services: a systematic mixed studies review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10867-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38605304 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Leveraging emergency department visits to connect older adults at risk for malnutrition and food insecurity to community resources: design and protocol development for the BRIDGE study.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Mar 3;6:36. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00576-3. eCollection 2020. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020. PMID: 32158549 Free PMC article.
-
Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria.BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e071536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071536. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37451739 Free PMC article.
-
Expert consensus on multilevel implementation hypotheses to promote the uptake of youth care guidelines: a Delphi study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 2;22(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01167-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 39095848 Free PMC article.
-
HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery Models for Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study.J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:23259582251342842. doi: 10.1177/23259582251342842. Epub 2025 May 27. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2025. PMID: 40420603 Free PMC article.
-
Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1535-e1543. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002108. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021. PMID: 33009320 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pless IB, Sibald AD, Smith MA, Russell MD. A reappraisal of the frequency of child abuse seen in pediatric emergency rooms. Child Abuse Negl 1987;11:193–200. - PubMed
-
- Keshavarz R, Kawashima R, Low C. Child abuse and neglect presentations to a pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med 2002;23:341–5. - PubMed
-
- King WK, Kiesel EL, Simon HK. Child abuse fatalities: are we missing opportunities for intervention? Pediatr Emerg Care 2006;22:211–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical