Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;7(4):e00572.
doi: 10.1002/mgg3.572. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients

Vanessa Di Gioacchino  1 , Sylvie Langlois  1   2   3 , Alison M Elliott  1   2   3
Affiliations

Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients

Vanessa Di Gioacchino et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Just as there is inconsistency with respect to coverage of genomic testing with insurance carriers, there is interprovincial discrepancy in Canada. Consequently, the option of private pay (e.g., self pay) arises, which can lead to inequities in access, particularly when patients may not be aware of this option. There are currently no published data regarding how the Canadian genetics community handles discussions of private pay options with patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of genetic healthcare professionals (GHPs: medical geneticists, genetic counselors, and genetic nurses) practicing in Canada toward these discussions.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to members of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors to assess frequencies, rationale, and ethical considerations regarding these conversations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Of 144 respondents, 95% reported discussing private pay and 65% reported working in a clinic without a policy on this issue. There were geographic and practice-specific differences. The most common circumstance for these discussions was when a test was clinically indicated (e.g., but funding was denied) followed by when the patient initiated the conversation. The most frequently discussed tests included: multi-gene panels (73% of respondents), noninvasive prenatal testing (62%), and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (58%). Although 65% felt it was ethical to discuss private pay, 35% indicated it was "sometimes" ethical.

Conclusion: With the increasing availability of genomic technologies, these findings inform how we practice and demonstrate the need for policy in this area.

Keywords: genetic counseling; genomic testing; policy; private pay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Audibert, F. , Bie, I. D. , Johnson, J. , Okun, N. , Wilson, R. D. , Armour, C. , … Kim, R. (2018). No. 348‐joint SOGC‐CCMG guideline: Update on prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 39(9), 805–817. 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berliner, J. L. , Fay, A. M. , Cummings, S. A. , Burnett, B. , & Tillmanns, T. (2013). NSGC practice guideline: Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 155–163. 10.1007/s10897-012-9547-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boycott, K. , Hartley, T. , Adam, S. , Bernier, F. , Chong, K. , Fernandez, B. A. , … Armour, C. M. (2015). The clinical application of genome‐wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists. Journal of Medical Genetics, 52, 431–437. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daly, M. B. , Plarski, R. , Berry, M. , Buys, S. S. , Farmer, M. , Friedman, S. , … Wisinski, K. B. (2018). Genetic/familial high‐risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf .
    1. de Jong, A. , & de Wert, G. M. W. R. (2015). Prenatal screening: An ethical agenda for the near future. Bioethics, 29(1), 46–55. 10.1111/bioe.12122 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types