Editorial Commentary: Morton Forks a Knee: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Needles Arthroscopy for Knee Meniscus Tears
- PMID: 30712632
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.021
Editorial Commentary: Morton Forks a Knee: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Needles Arthroscopy for Knee Meniscus Tears
Abstract
Recent literature tells us that knee arthroscopy in the setting of osteoarthritis is no better than placebo, but arthroscopy for isolated, nondegenerative meniscus tears is both helpful to patients and cost-effective. Since most patients with osteoarthritis have meniscus pathology, we need an accurate way to rule out degenerative disease in patients who are otherwise good candidates for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Magnetic resonance imaging can be misleading. Needle arthroscopy is a new tool that can potentially help dig us out of this diagnostic dilemma.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Needle Arthroscopy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meniscal Tears of the Knee.Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):554-562.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.030. Arthroscopy. 2019. PMID: 30712631
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
