A methodological approach to standardize and control the quality of the position and alignment of lamina implants on two-dimensional radiographs
- PMID: 30715653
- DOI: 10.1007/s11282-019-00374-5
A methodological approach to standardize and control the quality of the position and alignment of lamina implants on two-dimensional radiographs
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to validate a new method to detect the degree of correlation between simulated and real tilted blade implants as they appear on a single two-dimensional radiograph.
Methods: The angular correction factor (CF^) was defined as the coupling of two subsequent angle transformations, a set of five angular values describing the theoretical radiographic appearance of the blade implant: (1) three consecutive rotations about the axes of the blade ([Formula: see text], θ, and ψ, standing for pitch, roll, and yaw, respectively) to represent the polarization directions; (2) a two-dimensional projection defined by two angles (λ and [Formula: see text], respectively, longitude and latitude) to represent the vector of the X-ray beam intersecting the detector plate. Data of patients who received fixed prostheses supported by blade-form implants were employed to calculate a dimensional correction factor (CF°), a specific length through the major axis. The simulation of a distorted radiograph of a blade positioned in space was compared with the real radiograph. Differences in the angular measurements served as an initial test to assess the effectiveness of the method.
Results: In the acquired sets of periapical radiographs, mean misalignments of + 3.58° in longitude and - 0.04° in latitude were registered. The following variations were detected during the accuracy testing: the absolute error was 0.1 ± 7.5° for angle [Formula: see text]; 2.4 ± 6.7° for angle θ; - 1.0 ± 3.7° for angle ψ; 4.5 ± 8.6° for angle λ; and 2.0 ± 9.3° for angle [Formula: see text]. The linear dependence between CF° and CF^ was estimated by a robust linear regression: slope + 0.991, intercept + 0.007, and adjusted R2 0.992.
Conclusions: This a posteriori analysis introduces the explicit trigonometric equations of the theoretical standard (CF^) used to describe the blade implant radiographic position and misalignment on two-dimensional radiographs.
Keywords: Algorithms; Blade-form implant; Dental digital radiography; Radiographic image interpretation; Tissue–implant interactions.