Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 4;14(2):e0211198.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211198. eCollection 2019.

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the doctors and nurses knowledge of acute oxygen therapy

Affiliations

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the doctors and nurses knowledge of acute oxygen therapy

Olufemi O Desalu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Prescription and administration of oxygen in emergencies by healthcare providers are reported to be inappropriate in most settings. There is a huge gap in the knowledge of health care providers on various aspects of oxygen therapy, and this may be a barrier to optimal oxygen administration. Hence, it is essential to ascertain providers' knowledge of acute oxygen therapy so that appropriate educational interventions are instituted for better delivery. There is no available validated instrument to assess knowledge of acute oxygen therapy. The study aimed to develop, validate and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a questionnaire to determine the doctors and nurses understanding of acute oxygen therapy.

Methods: This study involved the development of the questionnaire contents by a literature review, assessment of face validity (n = 5), content validity, using a panel of experts (n = 10), item analysis and test-retest reliability among a sample (n = 121) of doctors and nurses.

Results: Face validity indicated that the questionnaire was quick to complete (10-15 min), most items were easy to follow and comprehensible. The global content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.85. The test-retest reliability statistics showed a kappa coefficient of 0.546-0.897 (all P<0.001) and percentage agreement of 80-98.3% indicating high temporal stability in the target population. In total, 90% of the items fulfilled the reliability acceptance criteria. Item discrimination analysis showed that most questions were at an acceptable level. The final questionnaire included 37 item questions and eight sections.

Conclusion: The designed questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing knowledge of acute oxygen therapy among doctors and nurses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the development and validity of the questionnaire.

References

    1. Cousins J, Wark P, McDonald V. Acute oxygen therapy: a review of prescribing and delivery practices. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2016; 11(1): 1067–1075. 10.2147/COPD.S103607 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bateman NT, Leach RM. ABC of oxygen: acute oxygen therapy.BMJ. 1998; 317:798–801 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin DS, Grocott MP III. Oxygen therapy in anesthesia: the yin and yang of O2. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111(6):867–871. 10.1093/bja/aet291 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cabello JB, Burls A, Emparanza JI, Bayliss S, Quinn T. Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 6:CD007160. - PubMed
    1. Wijesinghe M, Perrin K, Ranchord A, Simmonds M, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Routine use of oxygen in the treatment of myocardial infarction: systematic review. Heart 2009; 95:198–202. 10.1136/hrt.2008.148742 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types