Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 1;20(3):636.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20030636.

Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?

Affiliations
Review

Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?

Erminia Mariani et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The perspectives of regenerative medicine are still severely hampered by the host response to biomaterial implantation, despite the robustness of technologies that hold the promise to recover the functionality of damaged organs and tissues. In this scenario, the cellular and molecular events that decide on implant success and tissue regeneration are played at the interface between the foreign body and the host inflammation, determined by innate and adaptive immune responses. To avoid adverse events, rather than the use of inert scaffolds, current state of the art points to the use of immunomodulatory biomaterials and their knowledge-based use to reduce neutrophil activation, and optimize M1 to M2 macrophage polarization, Th1 to Th2 lymphocyte switch, and Treg induction. Despite the fact that the field is still evolving and much remains to be accomplished, recent research breakthroughs have provided a broader insight on the correct choice of biomaterial physicochemical modifications to tune the reaction of the host immune system to implanted biomaterial and to favor integration and healing.

Keywords: biomaterials; extra-cellular matrix; foreign body reaction; immune response; macrophages; scaffold.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Innate immune response to biomaterials: the development of the foreign body reaction. The main cellular players in the biomaterial-immune system interaction are represented. The main events, from the initial biomaterial implantation to fibrous encapsulation, are schematically described.

References

    1. Vishwakarma A., Bhise N.S., Evangelista M.B., Rouwkema J., Dokmeci M.R., Ghaemmaghami A.M., Vrana N.E., Khademhosseini A. Engineering Immunomodulatory Biomaterials to Tune the Inflammatory Response. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:470–482. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dhandayuthapani B., Yoshida Y., Maekawa T., Kumar D.S. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011;2011:290602. doi: 10.1155/2011/290602. - DOI
    1. Wiles K., Fishman J.M., De Coppi P., Birchall M.A. The Host Immune Response to Tissue-Engineered Organs: Current Problems and Future Directions. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2016;22:208–219. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0376. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roseti L., Parisi V., Petretta M., Cavallo C., Desando G., Bartolotti I., Grigolo B. Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017;78:1246–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rossi F., Santoro M., Perale G. Polymeric scaffolds as stem cell carriers in bone repair. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015;9:1093–1119. doi: 10.1002/term.1827. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources