Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 1;70(5):396-408.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800383. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

Systematic Review of Symptom Assessment Measures for Use in Measurement-Based Care of Bipolar Disorders

Joseph M Cerimele  1 , Simon B Goldberg  1 , Christopher J Miller  1 , Stephen W Gabrielson  1 , John C Fortney  1
Affiliations

Systematic Review of Symptom Assessment Measures for Use in Measurement-Based Care of Bipolar Disorders

Joseph M Cerimele et al. Psychiatr Serv. .

Abstract

Objective: Utilization of measurement-based care (MBC) for bipolar disorders is limited, in part because of uncertainty regarding the utility of available measures. The aim of this study was to synthesize the literature on patient-reported and clinician-observed measures of symptoms of bipolar disorder and the potential use of these measures in MBC.

Methods: A systematic review of multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and other gray literature) was conducted in June 2017 to identify validated measures. Data on the psychometric properties of each measure were extracted and used to assess the measure's clinical utility on the basis of established guidelines.

Results: Twenty-eight unique measures were identified in 39 studies, including four patient-reported and six clinician-observed measures assessing manic symptoms, three patient-reported and five clinician-observed measures of depressive symptoms, and six patient-reported and four clinician-observed measures of both symptom types. Patient-reported measures with the highest clinical utility included the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale for assessment of manic symptoms, the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR) (depressive symptoms), and the Internal State Scale (both types). Highly rated clinician (C)-observed scales were the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (mania), the QIDS-C (depressive symptoms), and the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (both types).

Conclusions: Suitable choices are available for MBC of bipolar disorders. The choice of a measure could be informed by clinical utility score and may also depend on how clinicians or practices weigh each category of the clinical utility scale and on the clinical setting and presenting problem.

Keywords: Scales/outcome & clinical measurement; bipolar disorder; measurement-based care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

Dr. A reports no competing interests. Dr. B reports no competing interests. Dr. C reports no competing interests. Mr. D reports no competing interests. Dr. E reports no competing interests.

References

    1. Belmaker RH: Bipolar disorder. N Engl J Med 351:476–486, 2004 - PubMed
    1. Bauer MS, Simon GE, Ludman E, Unützer J: ‘Bipolarity’ in bipolar disorder” distribution of manic and depressive symptoms in a treated population. Br J Psychiatry 187:87–88, 2005 - PubMed
    1. Frye MA: Bipolar disorder – a focus on depression. N Engl J Med 364:51–59, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schletter PJ, et al.: The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:530–537, 2002 - PubMed
    1. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schletter PJ, et al.: A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:261–269, 2003 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms