Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 5:8:e41602.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.41602.

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative

Affiliations

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative

Olavo B Amaral et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Most efforts to estimate the reproducibility of published findings have focused on specific areas of research, even though science is usually assessed and funded on a regional or national basis. Here we describe a project to assess the reproducibility of findings in biomedical science published by researchers based in Brazil. The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative is a systematic, multicenter effort to repeat between 60 and 100 experiments: the project will focus on a set of common methods, repeating each experiment in three different laboratories from a countrywide network. The results, due in 2021, will allow us to estimate the level of reproducibility of biomedical science in Brazil, and to investigate what aspects of the published literature might help to predict whether a finding is reproducible.

Keywords: Brazil; biochemistry; biomedical research; cell biology; chemical biology; metascience; mouse; open science; rat; replication; reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

OA, KN, AW, CC No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Selecting methods and papers for replication in the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative.
(A) Most frequent biological models used in main experiments within a sample of 100 Brazilian life sciences articles. (B) Most frequent methods used for quantitative outcome detection in these experiments. ‘Cell count’, ‘enzyme activity’ and ‘blood tests’ include various experiments for which methodologies vary and/or are not described fully in articles. Nociception tests, although frequent, were not considered for replication due to animal welfare considerations. (C) Flowchart describing the first full-text screening round to identify articles in our candidate techniques, which led us to select our final set of five methods.

Comment in

References

    1. ABC Considerações sobre o processo de avaliação da pós-graduação da CAPES. [January 25, 2019];2018 http://www.abc.org.br/IMG/pdf/documento_pg_da_abc_22032018_fim.pdf
    1. Angelo C. Brazil's scientists battle to escape 20-year funding freeze. Nature. 2016;539:480. doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.21014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:452–454. doi: 10.1038/533452a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker M, Dolgin E. Cancer reproducibility project releases first results. Nature. 2017;541:269–270. doi: 10.1038/541269a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barata RCB. Dez coisas que você deveria saber sobre o Qualis. Revista Brasileira De Pós-Graduação. 2016;13:13–40. doi: 10.21713/2358-2332.2016.v13.947. - DOI

Publication types