Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;27(6):1739-1753.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05392-8. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

The cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee

Affiliations

The cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee

Hema Mistry et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Osteochondral allografts (OCA) consist of a layer of hyaline cartilage and a layer of underlying bone. They are used to repair combined defects of articular cartilage and bone. Such defects often occur in people far too young to have knee arthroplasty, for whom the main alternative to OCA is conservative symptomatic care, which will not prevent development of osteoarthritis. The aim of this report was to assess the cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee.

Methods: Systematic review of evidence on clinical effectiveness and economic modelling.

Results: The evidence on osteochondral allograft transplantation comes from observational studies, but often based on good quality prospective registries of all patients having such surgery. Without controlled trials, it was necessary to use historical cohorts to assess the effect of osteochondral grafts. There is good evidence that OCA are clinically effective with a high graft survival rate over 20 years. If an OCA graft fails, there is some evidence that revision with a second OCA is also effective, though less so than primary OCA. Economic modelling showed that osteochondral allograft transplantation was highly cost-effective, with costs per quality adjusted life year much lower than many other treatments considered cost effective.

Conclusions: Osteochondral allograft transplantation appears highly cost-effective though the cost per quality adjusted life year varies according to the widely varying costs of allografts. Based on one small study, revision OCA also appears very cost-effective, but more evidence is needed.

Level of evidence: II.

Keywords: Allografts; Cost-effectiveness; Osteochondral; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
No OCA model structure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
OCA model structure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Model structure for knee arthroplasty

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson AF, Pagnani MJ. Osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles. Long-term results of excision of the fragment. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:830–834. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500617. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ara R, Brazier JE. Populating an economic model with health state utility values: moving toward better practice. Value Health. 2010;13:509–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00700.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Assenmacher AT, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Macalena JA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: a systematic review at long-term follow-up of 12.3 years. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:2160–2168. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balazs GC, Wang D, Burge AJ, Sinatro AL, Wong AC, Williams RJ. Return to play among elite basketball players after osteochondral allograft transplantation of full-thickness cartilage lesions. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6:7. doi: 10.1177/2325967118786941. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389:1424–1430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30059-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types