Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 May 1;154(5):421-429.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4752.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients

Eveline A J van Rein  1 , Rogier van der Sluijs  1 , Frank J Voskens  1 , Koen W W Lansink  2   3 , R Marijn Houwert  1   3 , Rob A Lichtveld  4 , Mariska A de Jongh  5 , Marcel G W Dijkgraaf  6 , Howard R Champion  7   8 , Frank J P Beeres  9 , Luke P H Leenen  1 , Mark van Heijl  1   10
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients

Eveline A J van Rein et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Prehospital trauma triage protocols are used worldwide to get the right patient to the right hospital and thereby improve the chance of survival and avert lifelong disabilities. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma set target levels for undertriage rates of less than 5%. None of the existing triage protocols has been able to achieve this target in isolation.

Objective: To develop and validate a new prehospital trauma triage protocol to improve current triage rates.

Design, setting, and participants: In this multicenter cohort study, all patients with trauma who were 16 years and older and transported to a trauma center in 2 different regions of the Netherlands were included in the analysis. Data were collected from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2014, in the Central Netherlands region for the design data cohort and from January 1 through December 31, 2015, in the Brabant region for the validation cohort. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2017, through July 19, 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: A new prediction model was developed in the Central Netherlands region based on prehospital predictors associated with severe injury. Severe injury was defined as an Injury Severity Score greater than 15. A full-model strategy with penalized maximum likelihood estimation was used to construct a model with 8 predictors that were chosen based on clinical reasoning. Accuracy of the developed prediction model was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. The model was externally validated in the Brabant region.

Results: Using data from 4950 patients with trauma from the Central Netherlands region for the design data set (58.3% male; mean [SD] age, 47 [21] years) and 6859 patients for the validation Brabant region (52.2% male; mean [SD] age, 51 [22] years), the following 8 significant predictors were selected for the prediction model: age; systolic blood pressure; Glasgow Coma Scale score; mechanism criteria; penetrating injury to the head, thorax, or abdomen; signs and/or symptoms of head or neck injury; expected injury in the Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax region; and expected injury in 2 or more Abbreviated Injury Scale regions. The prediction model showed a C statistic of 0.823 (95% CI, 0.813-0.832) and good calibration. The cutoff point with a minimum specificity of 50.0% (95% CI, 49.3%-50.7%) led to a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI, 87.5%-90.0%). External validation showed a C statistic of 0.831 (95% CI, 0.814-0.848) and adequate calibration.

Conclusions and relevance: The new prehospital trauma triage prediction model may lower undertriage rates to approximately 10% with an overtriage rate of 50%. The next step should be to implement this prediction model with the use of a mobile app for emergency medical services professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Calibration Plot of External Validation
The validation data were acquired from the Brabant region of the Netherlands. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Screen Shots of the Mobile App
EMS indicates emergency medical services; TT app, Trauma Triage App (Synappz).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. . A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366-378. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa052049 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Staudenmayer K, Weiser TG, Maggio PM, Spain DA, Hsia RY. Trauma center care is associated with reduced readmissions after injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):412-416. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000956 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newgard CD, Staudenmayer K, Hsia RY, et al. . The cost of overtriage: more than one-third of low-risk injured patients were taken to major trauma centers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(9):1591-1599. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1142 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Champion HR, Lombardo LV, Wade CE, Kalin EJ, Lawnick MM, Holcomb JB. Time and place of death from automobile crashes: research endpoint implications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):420-426. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001124 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Rein EAJ, Houwert RM, Gunning AC, Lichtveld RA, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Accuracy of prehospital triage protocols in selecting severely injured patients: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(2):328-339. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001516 - DOI - PubMed