Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0210900.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210900. eCollection 2019.

The impact of hyperlinks on reading text

Affiliations

The impact of hyperlinks on reading text

Gemma Fitzsimmons et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

There has been debate about whether blue hyperlinks on the Web cause disruption to reading. A series of eye tracking experiments were conducted to explore if coloured words in black text had any impact on reading behaviour outside and inside a Web environment. Experiment 1 and 2 explored the saliency of coloured words embedded in single sentences and the impact on reading behaviour. In Experiment 3, the effects of coloured words/hyperlinks in passages of text in a Web-like environment was explored. Experiment 1 and 2 showed that multiple coloured words in text had no negative impact on reading behaviour. However, if the sentence featured only a single coloured word, a reduction in skipping rates was observed. This suggests that the visual saliency associated with a single coloured word may signal to the reader that the word is important, whereas this signalling is reduced when multiple words are coloured. In Experiment 3, when reading passages of text containing hyperlinks in a Web environment, participants showed a tendency to re-read sentences that contained hyperlinked, uncommon words compared to hyperlinked, common words. Hyperlinks highlight important information and suggest additional content, which for more difficult concepts, invites rereading of the preceding text.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Example stimulus from Experiment 1 for the 5 different conditions.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Example stimulus from Experiment 2 of the six different versions of a single stimuli.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Two-way interaction between word frequency x word type interaction in Experiment 3.
Means and 95% Confidence Intervals for go-past times and total reading times.

References

    1. Treisman AM, Gelade G. A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980;12: 97–136. 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nielsen J. When bad design elements become the standard. 1999; Available: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/when-bad-design-elements-become-the-stan...
    1. Galitz WO. The essential guide to user interface design: An introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. 3rd ed New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
    1. Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev. 1977;84: 1–66. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 - DOI
    1. Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev. American Psychological Association; 1977;84: 127–190. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 - DOI

Publication types