Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep;42(3):721-729.
doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01081-9. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Analysis of safe entry zones into the brainstem

Affiliations
Review

Analysis of safe entry zones into the brainstem

Yang Yang et al. Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Intra-axial brainstem surgeries are challenging. Many experience-based "safe entry zones (SEZs)" into brainstem lesions have been proposed in the existing literature. The evidence for each one seems limited. English-language publications were retrieved using PubMed/MEDLINE. Studies that focused only on cadaveric anatomy were also included, but the clinical case number was treated as zero. The clinical evidence level was defined as "case report" when the surgical case number was ≤ 5, "limited evidence" when there were more than 5 but less than 25 cases, and "credible evidence" when a publication presented more than 25 cases. Twenty-five out of 32 publications were included, and 21 different SEZs were found for the brainstem: six SEZs were located in the midbrain, 9 SEZs in the pons, and 6 SEZs in the medulla. Case report evidence was found for 10 SEZs, and limited evidence for 7 SEZs. Four SEZs were determined to be backed by credible evidence. The proposed SEZs came from initial cadaveric anatomy studies, followed by some published clinical experience. Only a few SEZs have elevated clinical evidence. The choice of the right approach into the brainstem remains a challenge in each case.

Keywords: Brainstem lesions; Evidence level; Surgical safe entry zone.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jan;90(1):50-8 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg. 1999 Nov;91(5):768-75 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurg Rev. 2002 Mar;25(1-2):1-53; discussion 54-5 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurgery. 2005 Jun;56(6):1203-12; discussion 1212-4 - PubMed
    1. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006 Jun;49(3):168-72 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources