Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 15;74(10):1671-1678.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz034.

Approaches to Assessment of Muscle Mass and Myosteatosis on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Approaches to Assessment of Muscle Mass and Myosteatosis on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review

Behrang Amini et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background/objective: There is increasing use of computed tomography (CT) in sarcopenia research using a wide variety of techniques. We performed a systematic review of the CT literature to identify the differences between approaches used.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed from 1983 to 2017 was performed to identify studies that used CT muscle measurements to assess muscle mass and myosteatosis. The CT protocols were evaluated based on anatomic landmark(s), thresholding, muscle(s) segmented, key measurement (ie, muscle attenuation, cross-sectional area, volume), derived variables, and analysis software. From the described search, 657 articles were identified and 388 studies met inclusion criteria for this systematic review.

Results: Muscle mass was more commonly assessed than myosteatosis (330 vs. 125). The most commonly assessed muscle or muscle groups were total abdominal wall musculature (142/330 and 49/125 for muscle mass and myosteatosis, respectively) and total thigh musculature (90/330 and 48/125). The most commonly used landmark in the abdomen was the L3 vertebra (123/142 and 45/49 for muscle mass and myosteatosis, respectively). Skeletal muscle index and intermuscular adipose tissue were the most commonly used measures of abdominal wall muscle mass (114/142) and myosteatosis (27/49), respectively. Cut points varied across studies. A significant majority of studies failed to report important CT technical parameters, such as use of intravenous contrast and slice thickness (94% and 63%, respectively).

Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the CT approaches used for the assessment of muscle mass and myosteatosis. There is a need to develop consensus for CT-based evaluation of sarcopenia and myosteatosis.

Keywords: Body composition; Imaging; Muscle; Sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram on identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of full-text articles. *Non-computed tomography (CT) article refers to articles that did not use CT to assess body composition metrics as a primary modality (eg, magnetic resonance imaging).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of publications per year.

References

    1. Boutin RD, Bamrungchart S, Bateni CP, et al. . CT of patients with hip fracture: muscle size and attenuation help predict mortality. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:W208–W215. doi:10.2214/AJR.16.17226 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clynes MA, Edwards MH, Buehring B, Dennison EM, Binkley N, Cooper C. Definitions of sarcopenia: associations with previous falls and fracture in a population sample. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:445–452. doi:10.1007/s00223-015-0044-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Amaral TF. Sarcopenia and length of hospital stay. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70:595–601. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2015.207 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Olaya B, et al. . The role of muscle mass and body fat on disability among older adults: a cross-national analysis. Exp Gerontol. 2015;69:27–35. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boutin RD, Yao L, Canter RJ, Lenchik L. Sarcopenia: current concepts and imaging implications. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W255–W266. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14635 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms