Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;56(5):271-282.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105513. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Genetic diagnosis of subfertility: the impact of meiosis and maternal effects

Affiliations
Review

Genetic diagnosis of subfertility: the impact of meiosis and maternal effects

Alexander Gheldof et al. J Med Genet. 2019 May.

Abstract

During reproductive age, approximately one in seven couples are confronted with fertility problems. While the aetiology is diverse, including infections, metabolic diseases, hormonal imbalances and iatrogenic effects, it is becoming increasingly clear that genetic factors have a significant contribution. Due to the complex nature of infertility that often hints at a multifactorial cause, the search for potentially causal gene mutations in idiopathic infertile couples has remained difficult. Idiopathic infertility patients with a suspicion of an underlying genetic cause can be expected to have mutations in genes that do not readily affect general health but are only essential in certain processes connected to fertility. In this review, we specifically focus on genes involved in meiosis and maternal-effect processes, which are of critical importance for reproduction and initial embryonic development. We give an overview of genes that have already been linked to infertility in human, as well as good candidates which have been described in other organisms. Finally, we propose a phenotypic range in which we expect an optimal diagnostic yield of a meiotic/maternal-effect gene panel.

Keywords: clinical genetics; diagnostics; genetic screening/counselling; obstetrics and gynaecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of critical processes during the MI stage. (A) After DNA replication, sister chromatids of both homologous chromosome pairs are held together by multiple units of the cohesin complex. (B) Alignment of the homologous chromosomes is facilitated by the synaptonemal complex. (C) The first step of homologous recombination occurs through the formation of double strand breaks (DBS). This process is Spo-11 dependent, and strand invasion is mediated by the Rad51-DMC1 complex, which is stabilised by Hop2-Mnd1. (D) After homologous recombination, the cohesin complex of the sister chromatids is cleaved by separase along the length of the sister chromatids. Cohesin at the centromeres is protected by shugosin, inhibiting the separase-mediated cleaving. (E) Sister kinetochores connect to microtubules emanating from the same spindle poles, as such separating the newly recombined homologues.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the general methylation and transcriptional status of the oocyte, zygote and further developmental stages. From fertilisation on, the paternal DNA is actively demethylated. Demethylation of the maternal DNA occurs more passively, being not replaced during initial cell divisions. From the blastocyst stage on, expression of DNMT1 increases, which goes together with an increase of methylation of the embryonic DNA. Transcripts originating from the oocyte are very stable and constitute most of the mRNA during initial stages. However, from the 4–8 cell stage on, embryonic transcripts take over. SC, synaptonemal complex.

References

    1. Esteves SC, Hamada A, Kondray V, Pitchika A, Agarwal A. What every gynecologist should know about male infertility: an update. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:217–29. 10.1007/s00404-012-2274-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laissue P. Aetiological coding sequence variants in non-syndromic premature ovarian failure: From genetic linkage analysis to next generation sequencing. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2015;411:243–57. 10.1016/j.mce.2015.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Vos M, Devroey P, Fauser BCJM. Primary ovarian insufficiency. The Lancet 2010;376:911–21. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60355-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee JY, Dada R, Sabanegh E, Carpi A, Agarwal A. Role of genetics in azoospermia. Urology 2011;77:598–601. 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donker RB, Vloeberghs V, Groen H, Tournaye H, van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA, Land JA. Chromosomal abnormalities in 1663 infertile men with azoospermia: the clinical consequences. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2574–80. 10.1093/humrep/dex307 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances