Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 13;5(1):e000475.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000475. eCollection 2019.

Which parameters to use for sleep quality monitoring in team sport athletes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Which parameters to use for sleep quality monitoring in team sport athletes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

João Gustavo Claudino et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sleep quality is an essential component of athlete's recovery. However, a better understanding of the parameters to adequately quantify sleep quality in team sport athletes is clearly warranted.

Objective: To identify which parameters to use for sleep quality monitoring in team sport athletes.

Methods: Systematic searches for articles reporting the qualitative markers related to sleep in team sport athletes were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science online databases. The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. For the meta-analysis, effect sizes with 95% CI were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using a random-effects model. The coefficient of variation (CV) with 95% CI was also calculated to assess the level of instability of each parameter.

Results: In general, 30 measuring instruments were used for monitoring sleep quality. A meta-analysis was undertaken on 15 of these parameters. Four objective parameters inferred by actigraphy had significant results (sleep efficiency with small CV and sleep latency, wake episodes and total wake episode duration with large CV). Six subjective parameters obtained from questionnaires and scales also had meaningful results (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (sleep efficiency), Likert scale (Hooper), Likert scale (no reference), Liverpool Jet-Lag Questionnaire, Liverpool Jet-Lag Questionnaire (sleep rating) and RESTQ (sleep quality)).

Conclusions: These data suggest that sleep efficiency using actigraphy, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Likert scale, Liverpool Jet-Lag Questionnaire and RESTQ are indicated to monitor sleep quality in team sport athletes.

Prospero registration number: CRD42018083941.

Keywords: actigraphy; performance; questionnaires and scales; recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analysis of short-term intervention studies.

References

    1. Ohayon M, Wickwire EM, Hirshkowitz M, et al. National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality recommendations: first report. Sleep Health 2017;3:6–19. 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.11.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harvey AG, Stinson K, Whitaker KL, et al. The subjective meaning of sleep quality: a comparison of individuals with and without insomnia. Sleep 2008;31:383–93. 10.1093/sleep/31.3.383 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simpson NS, Gibbs EL, Matheson GO. Optimizing sleep to maximize performance: implications and recommendations for elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017;27:266–74. 10.1111/sms.12703 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta L, Morgan K, Gilchrist S. Does elite sport degrade sleep quality? A systematic review. Sports Med 2017;47:1317–33. 10.1007/s40279-016-0650-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall GJG, Turner AN. The importance of sleep for athletic performance. Strength Cond J 2016;38:61–7. 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000189 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources