[Findings of subpartal monitoring, status of the newborn infant and evaluation of cardiotocographic findings]
- PMID: 3073
[Findings of subpartal monitoring, status of the newborn infant and evaluation of cardiotocographic findings]
Abstract
The parameters of the intrapartal fetal CTG and the actual pH are related to each other and to the Apgar score of the newborn. The interpretation was carried out by means of groups of 300 to 600 cases. The actual fetal pH has the most compact relation to the Apgar score of the newborn (C equals 0,31). But also this contingence is unsatisfactory. At fetal acidosis most of the Apgar scores are pathological, in that manner the pH is the most important test for indication of operative delivery. The rare CTG pattern as dip II and variable decelerations combined with tachycardia of bradycardia, the bradycardia with 80 bpm or less, are likewise indications of urgent delivery.
Similar articles
-
Deceleration/contraction ratios as an index of fetal health during labor.Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jun;51(6):666-70. Obstet Gynecol. 1978. PMID: 26900
-
Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor--a multi-center, case controlled study.J Perinat Med. 2007;35(5):408-14. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.097. J Perinat Med. 2007. PMID: 17685855 Clinical Trial.
-
[Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Feb;37 Suppl 1:S34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.11.009. Epub 2008 Jan 8. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008. PMID: 18191915 Review. French.
-
[Value of the Hammacher score and fetal blood analysis in subpartal monitoring of the child].Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1984 Jan-Feb;188(1):12-20. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1984. PMID: 6538727 German.
-
Fetal monitoring in pregnancy.Adv Pediatr. 1976;22:83-112. Adv Pediatr. 1976. PMID: 773133 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Cardiotocographic scores compared with acid-base status, apgar scores and umbilical blood gas levels.Arch Gynecol. 1980 Jan;229(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02109827. Arch Gynecol. 1980. PMID: 7362276 No abstract available.