22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms
- PMID: 30731044
- DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1564362
22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms
Abstract
Background: To overcome the limitations of using cytological specimen alone for the diagnosis of challenging pancreatic lesions, biopsy needles have been developed to procure histological specimens during EUS, especially for the discrimination of several specific pancreatic tumors requiring adequate histological samples. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided 22-gauge (G) fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles and 22G fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles for sampling pancreatic masses.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all EUS-guided sampling performed between November 2012 and April 2016. 422 cases sampled with a 22G FNA needle (N = 254) or a 22G FNB needle (N = 168) were recruited for this study. The specimen quality analyses, technical characteristics, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) for the pancreatic masses were reviewed and compared.
Results: There was no significant difference in the procurement of adequate histological specimens (75.0% vs. 79.5%; p = .277) or the presence of diagnostic histological specimens (71.3% vs. 77.4%; p = .155) between FNA and FNB groups, respectively. There were also no significant differences in the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPVs, or NPVs of the cytological, histological, and overall analyses for FNA and FNB groups in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy. However, 22G biopsy needles demonstrated a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma pancreatic neoplasms than 22G FNA needles (69.8% vs. 57.9%, p = .033).
Conclusions: 22G FNB needle demonstrated a better histological diagnostic yield in the differentiation between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma pancreatic neoplasms.
Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration; fine needle biopsy; pancreatic mass.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26419845 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):94-99. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1390597. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29065734 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1392. Epub 2012 May 31. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22658389 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):893-903.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. PMID: 31310744
-
Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Sep-Oct;9(5):389-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 5. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020. PMID: 32680792 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous