Modern creatinine (Bio)sensing: Challenges of point-of-care platforms
- PMID: 30731344
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.01.048
Modern creatinine (Bio)sensing: Challenges of point-of-care platforms
Abstract
The importance of knowing creatinine levels in the human body is related to the possible association with renal, muscular and thyroid dysfunction. Thus, the accurate detection of creatinine may indirectly provide information surrounding those functional processes, therefore contributing to the management of the health status of the individual and early diagnosis of acute diseases. The questions at this point are: to what extent is creatinine information clinically relevant?; and do modern creatinine (bio)sensing strategies fulfil the real needs of healthcare applications? The present review addresses these questions by means of a deep analysis of the creatinine sensors reported in the literature over the last five years. There is a wide range of techniques for detecting creatinine, most of them based on optical readouts (20 of the 33 papers collected in this review). However, the use of electrochemical techniques (13 of the 33 papers) is recently emerging in alignment with the search for a definitive and trustworthy creatinine detection at the point-of-care level. In this sense, biosensors (7 of the 33 papers) are being established as the most promising alternative over the years. While creatinine levels in the blood seem to provide better information about patient status, none of the reported sensors display adequate selectivity in such a complex matrix. In contrast, the analysis of other types of biological samples (e.g., saliva and urine) seems to be more viable in terms of simplicity, cross-selectivity and (bio)fouling, besides the fact that its extraction does not disturb individual's well-being. Consequently, simple tests may likely be used for the initial check of the individual in routine analysis, and then, more accurate blood detection of creatinine could be necessary to provide a more genuine diagnosis and/or support the corresponding decision-making by the physician. Herein, we provide a critical discussion of the advantages of current methods of (bio)sensing of creatinine, as well as an overview of the drawbacks that impede their definitive point-of-care establishment.
Keywords: Blood analysis; Creatinine; Early diagnosis; Enzymatic biosensors; Healthcare; POC devices.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Electrochemical Creatinine (Bio)Sensors for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Renal Malfunction and Chronic Kidney Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 13;13(10):1737. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101737. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37238220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Miniaturized Bio-and Chemical-Sensors for Point-of-Care Monitoring of Chronic Kidney Diseases.Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;18(4):942. doi: 10.3390/s18040942. Sensors (Basel). 2018. PMID: 29565315 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Facilitating Earlier Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease through Point-of-Care Biosensors: A Review.Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;46(1):53-82. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2018025818. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2018. PMID: 29717677 Review.
-
A review of recent advances in non-enzymatic electrochemical creatinine biosensing.Anal Chim Acta. 2021 Oct 23;1183:338748. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338748. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Anal Chim Acta. 2021. PMID: 34627521 Review.
-
Antifouling Strategies for Electrochemical Biosensing: Mechanisms and Performance toward Point of Care Based Diagnostic Applications.ACS Sens. 2021 Apr 23;6(4):1482-1507. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.1c00390. Epub 2021 Mar 25. ACS Sens. 2021. PMID: 33765383 Review.
Cited by
-
Bioenzyme-free colorimetric assay for creatinine determination based on Mn3O4 nanoparticles catalyzed oxidation of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine.Mikrochim Acta. 2023 Dec 19;191(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-06129-8. Mikrochim Acta. 2023. PMID: 38114756
-
Trend in creatinine determining methods: Conventional methods to molecular-based methods.Anal Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 20;2(5-6):308-325. doi: 10.1002/ansa.202000074. eCollection 2021 Jun. Anal Sci Adv. 2020. PMID: 38716155 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why Not Glycine Electrochemical Biosensors?Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 21;20(14):4049. doi: 10.3390/s20144049. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32708149 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent Trends in Electrochemical Sensors for Vital Biomedical Markers Using Hybrid Nanostructured Materials.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020 May 12;7(13):1902980. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902980. eCollection 2020 Jul. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020. PMID: 32670744 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in molecularly imprinted polymers for clinical biomarker detection (2021-2025).Mikrochim Acta. 2025 Aug 9;192(9):572. doi: 10.1007/s00604-025-07443-z. Mikrochim Acta. 2025. PMID: 40783452 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources